Aiyanarasamy v. The District Collector

Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.05.2026.

¶2Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the 1st respondent and Mr.Durai Gunasekaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent.

¶3By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 07.05.2026 before the respondents, requesting them to survey and mark the boundaries of the subject land. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition. Page3 of 5

¶5In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of within a period of 6 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.

¶6Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.

¶7In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 1st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 07.05.2026 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, including the adjacent land owners, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8It is made clear that this order is passed only for the purpose of issuing a direction to the official respondent for conducting survey and laying boundary stones at the subject land. If there is any dispute with regard to the title/possession over the said property, the same has to be decided only by way of filing a suit before an appropriate Civil Court. Page4 of 5

¶9If any police protection is required at the time of conducting survey, the revenue officials are granted liberty to avail the same by approaching the 2nd respondent. In such case, the 2nd respondent shall provide all necessary protection to the revenue officials till the completion of survey at the subject land.

¶10With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 29-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order nsa To

¶1The District Collector Uthangarai, Krishnagiri District

¶2The Inspectoro of Police uthangarai Police station, krishnagiri District WPoNo.o29296oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. nsa WPoNo.o29296oofo2026 29-07-2026 Page5oofo5

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Aiyanarasamy S/o Late Palanisamy 64A Krishnagiri main Raod, uthanagarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Uthangarai, Krishnagiri District 2. The Inspector of Police uthangarai Police station, krishnagiri District 3. Sankar S/o Lakshmanan, Minakshi Jewelles, Krishnagiri Main Raod, uthanarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondnet to survey the petitioners family properties comprised in Old S. No 9/1 new S. Nos 108/6A 108/7 and 108/9 situated at Krishnagiri Main road, uthangarai, Krishnagiri District based on will dated 22.12.1959 and will dated 17.03.1986 and fix the boundaries along with adequate police protection Page2 of 5 For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Thiruvengadam For Respondent(s): Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, Govt. counsel for R1 Mr.Durai Gunasekaran, Govt. counsel for R2