- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 22 July 2026
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- WP 28373/2026
Judgment
ORDER The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.12.2025.
¶2The case of the petitioner is that she submitted a representation to respondents 1 and 2 requesting them to instruct the third respondent herein to forthwith conduct an enquiry and include the names of all the legal heirs of the late Ramalinga Naicker, namely, (1) Rajeshwari, (2) Parameshwari, and (3) Lakshmi, along with their brother Prakasam, in respect of Patta No. 618 and to issue a fresh joint patta. However, the respondents have not considered the same till date. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition for appropriate relief. Page2 of 4
¶3Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents, submitted that the representation of the petitioner dated 03.12.2025 would be considered by the 3rd respondent, who is the competent authority, and appropriate orders would be passed thereon, on merits within a period of six (6) weeks, after issuing notice to the parties concerned.
¶4Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made on either side, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.12.2025. The 3rd respondent shall pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after issuing notice to the petitioner as well as any other interested parties and affording them an opportunity of a personal hearing.
¶5With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 22-07-2026 Asi Page3 of 4
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. Asi To
¶1The District Revenue Officer (DRO) Chengalpattu District Chengalpattu 603001.
¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) Chengalpattu Revenue Division Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District.
¶3The Tahsildar Thiruporur Taluk Thiruporur, Chengalpattu District. 22-07-2026 Page4 of 4
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY P.Lakshmi W/o.Late Palani No.9 Alamaram Street Zamin Royapettai, Chrompet Chennai 600044. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Revenue Officer (DRO) Chengalpattu District Chengalpattu 603001. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) Chengalpattu Revenue Division Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District. 3. The Tahsildar Thiruporur Taluk Thiruporur, Chengalpattu District. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 herein to instruct the 3rd respondent herein to forthwith conduct enquiry and include all the names of the Legal Heirs of late Ramalinga Naicker namely Page1 of 4 1. Mrs.Rajeshwari, 2. Parameshwari and Mrs.Lakshmi along with their brother Mr.Prakasamin Patta No. 618 and issue fresh joint patta by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 03.12.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Bharathi For Respondent(s): Ms.Inthu Karunakaran Government Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.