VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

Nandhagopal v. The State Rep by the Superintendent of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 July 2025
Bench
P. Velmuruganauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 20478/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow P. Velmurugan

Judgment

ORDER This petition is filed to transfer the investigation in Crime No.116 of 2024 from the second respondent to any other independent investigating

agency and file final report within a stipulated time period as may be fixed by this Court.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though the petitioner gave a complaint before the second respondent, they have refused to register the case and therefore, they have approached the Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. for issuing direction to register the case. The learned Magistrate refused to grant the relief and thereafter, the petitioner has approached this Court and filed a petition for a direction and the FIR was registered and subsequently, one of the accused was arrested and he also obtained bail. One of the accused has not been secured so far. The respondents-Police are not showing any progress and therefore, though a case was registered in the year 2022, he ws able to get only registration of the FIR in the year 2024. Even after two years, the petitioner is not able to see the light of the investigation and therefore, the present petition is filed by him.

¶3Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that though one of the accused was arrested and he also obtained bail with conditions, since he did not comply with the condition imposed by the order and the order of bail was granted to the accused, subsequently, the bail was cancelled and he was also arrested and he is in

prison. One of the accused is absconding. This is a case of job racketing and the respondents are taking effective steps to conclude the investigation.

¶4Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶5The petitioner, though initially filed a petition under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. before the Magistrate, the same was dismissed and subsequently, on the direction of this Court, the case was registered in Crime No.116 of 2024 and now, the investigation is in progress. The grounds taken by the petitioner are not the grounds to transfer the investigation. Therefore, the respondents-Police are directed to conclude the investigation and file the charge-sheet within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, failing which, this case shall automatically stand transferred to CCB for further investigation.

¶6With the above direction, this petition is disposed of.

22.07.2025 cs

To

¶1The Superintendent of Police, Chengalpattu.

¶2The Sub-Inspector of Police, Kayar Police Station, Chengalpattu.

¶3The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

P.VELMURUGAN, J cs

22.07.2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 22.07.2025 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN -- Nandhagopal, S/o Varadharajan .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The State, rep. by The Superintendent of Police, Chengalpattu. 2. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Kayar Police Station, Chengalpattu. .. Respondents Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. / Section 528 BNSS, praying to transfer the investigation in Crime No.116 of 2024 from the second respondent to any other independent investigating agency and file final areport within a stipulated time period as may be fixed by this Court. For petitioner : M/s.S.Arun Kumar For respondents: Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.