VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Economical Roofs and Structures v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
14 July 2026
Bench
K. Surenderauthor
Case no.
WP 27080/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition seeking a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.05.2026 requesting permission to remit the balance amount payable pursuant to the order passed by the Employees' Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal in instalments. Page2 of 4

¶2Mr.R.Vishnu, the learned counsel takes notice for the respondent.

¶3By consent of both sides, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶4The brief facts of the case are as follows: The petitioner is a partnership firm engaged in business. The respondent by order dated 05.08.2021, levied damages of Rs.4,13,886/- under Section 14B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 for the period from November 2013 to February 2020. Challenging the said order, the petitioner preferred EPF Appeal No.78 of 2021 before the Appellate Tribunal. During the pendency of the appeal, the Tribunal, by an interim order dated 26.05.2022, directed the petitioner to deposit Rs.75,000/-, which was duly complied with. Subsequently, by order dated 17.02.2026, the Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by granting 25% waiver of the damages. After adjusting the amount already deposited and 25% of waiver amount, the petitioner is liable to pay a balance sum of Rs.2,35, 415/-. As the petitioner's business has been closed and it is facing sever financial hardship, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 11.05.2026 to the respondent requesting permission to pay the balance amount in 15 equal monthly instalments. Since the said representation has not been considered, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition. Page3 of 4

¶5Heard both sides and perused the records.

¶6Taking note of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the financial condition of the petitioner's company, which has ceased its business operations and in order to afford a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner to discharge the liability, this Court deems it appropriate to reduce the damages payable by the petitioner to a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- from Rs.2,35,415/-.

¶7The petitioner shall pay the amount of Rs.2,00,000/- in four equal monthly instalments starting from August 2026.

¶8It is made clear that in the event of default in payment of any of the instalments within the stipulated time, it is open to the respondent to proceed in accordance with law for recovery of the entire outstanding amount without any further reference to this Court. Page4 of 4 K.SURENDER J. JAI

¶9With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. 14-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order JAI To Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organisation (Ministry of Labour and Employees Government of India) Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan No.37 Royapettah High Road, Chennai 600014. 14-07-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER Economical Roofs And Structures No.7 Balavinayaka Nagar No.1 Main Road, Arumbakkam Chennai 600106. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organisation (Ministry of Labour and Employees Government of India) Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan No.37 Royapettah High Road, Chennai 600014. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent herein to consider the representation, dated 11.05.2026 submitted by the petitioner. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Vijaya Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Vishnu

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.