- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 July 2026
- Bench
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Case no.
- WP 27592/2026
Judgment
ORDER An order dated 24.12.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits.
¶2Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2.
¶3On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired. Page3 of 5
¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 10% pre-deposit was made while lodging the appeal. On instructions, he submits that the petitioner agrees to remit an additional 15% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle.
¶5Subject to the remittance of an additional 15% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order in original is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of an additional 15% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the bank attachment shall stand raised.
¶6The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 28-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RNA Page4 of 5 To
¶1The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Office of the Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST) (Appeal), Integrated New Commercial taxes Building, IIIrd Floor, SF No. 400/1, 7,8,46, Pudur B village Erode 638 002
¶2The Deputy State Tax Officer 2/ Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Kodumudi Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Building, North Prathachanam Road, Karur 639001.
¶3The Branch Manager State Bank of India, Arachalur. Page5 of 5
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA and W.M.P.Nos.30237, 30240 & 30241 of 2026 28-07-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.Nos.30237, 30240 & 30241 of 2026 Arachalur Dhamotharan Chandrasekaran Proprietor, Palanimurugan Lathe 97, Kodumudi Road, Arachalur, Erode 638101. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Office of the Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST) (Appeal), Integrated New Commercial taxes Building, IIIrd Floor, SF No. 400/1, 7,8,46, Pudur B village, Erode 638 002 2. The Deputy State Tax Officer 2/ Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Kodumudi Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Building, North Prathachanam Road, Karur 639001. 3. The Branch Manager State Bank of India, Arachalur. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, call for the records pertaining to the Impugned Order on the file of the 2nd Respondent in Reference No. ZD331225380603K dated 24.12.2025 in GSTIN/ID Page2 of 5 33AOVPC3889G1ZJ for the F.Y. 2021-22 and consequential Impugned Order passed by the 1st Respondent in FORM GST APL-02 in ARN # AD3303260681952 in GSTIN/Temp ID/UIN 33AOVPC3889G1ZJ dated 15.04.2026 and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to raise the bank attachment notice in FORM GST DRC-13, Notice to a third person under Section 79(1) (c), dated 12.05.2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Ananth For Respondent(s): Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, Government Counsel (Tax) for R1 & R2 ************
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.