- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 14 July 2026
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- CMA 250/2023
Judgment
Judgment This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the award passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Special Sub Court No.1, Motor Page2 of 7 Accident Claims Petition, Court of Small Causes, Chennai, in M.C.O.P.No. 3783 of 2016 dated 19.02.2021,wherein the claimant is seeking for enhancement of compensation.
¶2The case of the claimant is that on 09.10.2015, when he was proceeding on his cycle at Perungudi -OMR Salai at about 17.00 hours, near the Tolgate, the offending vehicle, viz., an Auto Rickhsaw was driven in a rash and negligent manner and it dashed against the cycle. As a result of which, the claimant was thrown out of the vehicle and he sustained a left frontal bone fracture with left frontal EDH. The claimant underwent treatment as an inpatient for nearly 12 days and as an outpatient at the institute of neurosurgery for nearly two years. It is under these circumstances, the claim petition came to be filed before the Tribunal.
¶3The Tribunal on considering the facts and circumstances of the case and on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence came to the conclusion that the accident had taken place only due to the rash and negligent driving on the part of the driver of the Auto Rickshaw.
¶4Having rendered such a finding, the Tribunal proceeded to fix the total compensation at Rs.2,13,250/- under the following heads :- Sl.No. Compensation awarded under the head Amount (in Rs.) Page3 of 7
¶1Disability Rs.1,20,000/-
¶2Pain and Sufferings Rs. 25,000/-
¶3Transportation Rs.5,000/-
¶4Extra Nourishment Rs.10,000/-
¶5Attender Charges Rs.3,250/-
¶6Loss of Earnings Rs.20,000/-
¶7Loss of future prospects Rs.30,000/-Total Rs.2,13,250/-
¶5The above compensation was directed to be paid with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum. Aggrieved by the same, the claimant has filed this appeal seeking for enhancement of compensation.
¶6Heard Ms.Ramya V Rao, learned counsel for appellant and Mr.Poomalai, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent.
¶7This Court carefully considered the submissions made on the side of the appellant and the materials available on record.
¶8This Court also carefully went through the award passed by the Tribunal.
¶9In the case in hand, the nature of injury sustained by the claimant is grievous in nature, more particularly, since there was a frontal EDH which Page4 of 7 required prolonged treatment. Therefore, the claimant had undergone treatment in the institute of neurosurgery continuously till 11.05.2018. Hence, this Court is inclined to reconsider the compensation fixed by the Tribunal under various heads. This Court has also taken into consideration the disability certificate that was issued by the Medical board, which was marked as Ex.C1, wherein the permanent disability was assessed at 40%.
¶10The Tribunal fixed the compensation under the head of disability by applying the percentage method and only Rs.3,000/- was fixed per percentage of disability. Considering the fact that the accident had taken place in the year 2015, this Court is inclined to fix a sum of Rs.5,000/- per percentage. Thus, the compensation under the head of disability is fixed as follows:- Disability = Rs.5,000 x 40
= Rs.2,00,000/-
¶11The compensation awarded under the head of pain and sufferings is enhanced to Rs.1,50,000/-, transportation charges to Rs.75,000/-, Extra Nourishment to Rs.1,00,000/- and Attender Charges to Rs.50,000/-. Insofar as the loss of earnings is concerned, the claimant would not have been able to attend any work at least for ten months and therefore, this Court is inclined to fix the compensation under this head to Rs.10,000 x 10 months = Rs.1,00,000/-. Page5 of 7
¶12The Tribunal has granted compensation under the head of loss of future prospects at Rs.30,000/- and the same is set-aside. Instead, this Court is inclined to fix a sum of Rs.50,000/- under the head of loss of amenities.
¶13In the light of the above discussion, this Court modifies the compensation in the following manner: Sl.No. Compensation awarded under the head Amount by the Tribunal (in Rs.) Amount awarded by this Court (in Rs.)
¶1Disability Rs.1,20,000/-Rs.2,00,000/-
¶2Pain and Sufferings Rs. 25,000/-Rs.1,50,000/-
¶3Transportation Rs.5,000/-Rs.75,000/-
¶4Extra Nourishment Rs.10,000/-Rs.1,00,000/-
¶5Attender Charges Rs.3,250/-Rs.50,000/-
¶6Loss of Earnings Rs.20,000/-Rs.1,00,000/-
¶7Loss
of
future prospectus Rs.30,000/--
¶8Loss of amenities Rs.50,000/- Total Rs.2,13,250/- Rs.7,25,000
¶14The compensation awarded by the Tribunal at Rs.2,13,250/- is enhanced to Rs.7,25,000/-. The Insurance Company is directed to deposit the enhanced compensation, less the amount already deposited, together with interest at 7.5% p.a. from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of this judgment. Insofar as Page6 of 7 the enhanced compensation is concerned, the deficit court fee, if not paid, shall be paid by the appellant. The other directions issued by the Tribunal with regard to the mode of payment of compensation remains unaltered.
¶15In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed in the above terms. No costs. 14-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RKA To The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/ Special Sub Court No.1, Motor Accident Claims Petition Court of Small Causes, Chennai. CMAoNo.o250oofo2023 N.ANANDoVENKATESHoJ. RKA CMAoNo.o250oofo2023 14-07-2026 Page7oofo7
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH T.Babu S/o.Thanthoni No 11, 3rd Cross Street, Perungudi, Chennai 600 096. ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. K.Devan S/o Kannan, Old No 3/256, New No 3/68, Kolavizhi Amman Nagar, 4th Street, Palavakkam, Chennai 600 041. 2. Bharti Axa General Insurance Co Ltd 2nd Floor, Metro Plaza, 162, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. ..Respondent(s) Civil Miscellaneous appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to allow the appeal and enhance the compensation in M.C.O.P.No. 3783 of 2016 dated 19.02.2021 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/ Special Sub Court No.1, Motor Accident Claims Petition Court of Small Causes, Chennai. For Appellant(s): Mrs.Ramya V.Rao For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Poomalai For R2
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.