VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

G.Ramakrishnan v. The Thasildhar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 August 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 30957/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

Order This writ petition has been filed seeking to direct the 1st respondent to conduct survey in the petitioner's land in Survey No.29/10B2, Vattakutittai Village of Bhuvanagiri Taluk by considering the petitioner's application dated

01.07.2026 with adequate police protection from the 2nd respondent.

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner made a representation dated

01.07.2026 seeking to survey and demarcate the petitioner's property in Survey No.29/10B2 Vattakuttai Village of Bhuvanagiri Taluk. Since the same was not considered the 1st respondent, the present writ petition has been filed.

3.Mr.P.Elayaraj Kumar, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the 1st respondent and Mr.Durai Gunasekaran, learned Government's Counsel, accepts notice behalf of 2nd respondent. Page2 of 6

4.Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the 1st respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation dated 01.07.2026 will be considered and disposed of within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner; the learned Government's Counsel appearing for the 1st respondents and the learned Government Counsel (Crl.Side) appearing for the 2nd respondent.

6.Considering the submissions made by both parties and in view of the limited prayer sought for in this writ petition, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.07.2026 and conduct a survey and demarcate the subject properties, after issuing prior notice to the petitioner and other parties concerned, if any, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If any need arises for Police assistance, it is open to the 1st respondent to request for Police protection from the 2rd respondent/jurisdictional Police. If any such request is made, the 2rd respondent/jurisdictional Police is directed to provide an adequate Police protection for conducting the survey.

7.It is made clear that this order is passed solely for the purpose of directing 1st respondent to conduct a survey and demarcate the subject property. Page3 of 6 If any dispute arises regarding the possession of the property, it must be resolved by filing a suit before a competent Civil Court. In the event of a title dispute, official respondents shall not take possession of the property and hand it over to any party. It is up to the parties concerned to seek recovery of possession through the due process of law.

8.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 06-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order rst Page4 of 6 To

1.The Thasildhar, Bhuvanagiri Taluk, Bhuvanagiri, Cuddalore District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Bhuvanagiri Police Station, cuddalore District. Page5 of 6 WPoNo.o30957oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. rst WPoNo.o30957oofo2026 06-08-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY G.Ramakrishnan, S/o.Govindasamy, North Street, Vadakuthittai, Melamanakudi Post, Bhuvanagiri Taluk, Cuddalore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Thasildhar, Bhuvanagiri Taluk, Bhuvanagiri, Cuddalore District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Bhuvanagiri Police Station, Cuddalore District. 3.Krishnan, S/o.Veerasamy, North Street, Vadakuthittai, Melamankudi Post, Bhuvanagiri Taluk, Cuddalore District. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct 1st respondent to survey the petitioner's land in Survey No.29/10B2, Vattakutittai Village of Bhuvanagiri Taluk by consideration the petitioner's application dated 01.07.2026 with adequate police protection from the 2nd respondent. Page1 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Athilagan For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Elayaraj Kumar Special Government Pleader For R1 Mr.Durai Gunaseakran Government's Counsel (Crl.Side) For R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.