VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Vallarasu v. The State Rep by the Sub Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 July 2026
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 18839/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow G.K. Ilanthiraiyan

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 126(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No. 112 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. Page2 of 6

¶2The case of the prosecution is that on 26.06.2026, when the defacto complainant questioned the rash and negligent driving of the petitioner, he abused him in a filthy language and also attacked him with iron rod. Due to which, he sustained injuries. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the defacto complainant and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant with iron rod due to which he sustained injuries and the injured underwent treatment in the hospital for 3 days. Hence, she opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Page3 of 6

¶5I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record.

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/-( Rupees Ten Thousand Only) to the credit of Crime No. 112 of 2026 and the defacto complainant is permitted to withdraw the amount. On such deposit and production of proof, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Veppanthattai, Perambalur District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions:

(a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled and the respondent is at liberty to secure the petitioner/accused and proceed in accordance with law. Page4 of 6

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

(c) the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) to the credit of Crime No. 112 of 2026 and the defacto complainant is permitted to withdraw the amount.

(d) The petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

(e) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

(f) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 17-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order nr Page5 of 6 To:

¶1The Judicial Magistrate, Veppanthattai, Perambalur District.

¶2The Sub Inspector of Police V.Kalathur Police Station, Perambalur District.

¶3The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras CRLoOPoNo.o18839oofo2026 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,oJ. NR CRLoOPoNo.o18839oofo2026 17-07-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Vallarasu ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by The Sub Inspector of Police V.Kalathur Police Station, Perambalur District. Crime no.112 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on Bail in the event of his arrest at the hands of the respondent police in connection with Crime no.112 of 2026 on the file of Sub Inspector of Police, V.Kalathur Police Station, Perambalur District. For Petitioner(s): M.Velmurugan For Respondent(s): Ms.R.S.Indira, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.