- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 July 2026
- Bench
- C.Kumarappan
- Case no.
- CRL OP 18817/2026
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on
05.07.2026 for the alleged offence under Section 8(c), 20(b)(II)(B), 22(b), 29(1) of NDPS Act in Crime No.210 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page1 of 5
¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and along with other accused were found in possession of 1.100 Kgs of Ganja and 12 grams of OG Ganja and the petitioner was in the possession of 0.300grms of Ganja and
0.92mg of methamphetamine. Hence, the case.
¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioner.
¶4Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has been incarcerated since 05.07.2026, however, fairly conceded that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. However, he opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioner.
¶5I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record.
¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; taking note of the Page2 of 5 submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side); considering the quantity involved is of an intermediate quantity and upon the fact that the recovery from the petitioner is 300 grams of ganja and 0.92mg of methamphetamine and upon the further fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to certain conditions.
¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Egmore, Chennai, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, Page3 of 5 the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 28-07-2026 SHL Note:
¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To:
¶1The II Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Egmore, Chennai.
¶2The Central prison, Puzhal II, Chennai.
¶3The Inspector of Police, D-1 Triplicane Police Station, Chennai
¶4The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras Page4 of 5 CRLoOPoNo.o18817oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPANoJ. SHL CRLoOPoNo.o18817oofo2026 28-07-2026 Page5oofo5
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Shabbeer Ahamed ..Petitioner Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police D1 Triplicane Police Station, Chennai. Crime No.210 of 2026 ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in respect of Crime No.210 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, D1 Triplicane Police Station, Chennai. For Petitioner: Mr.C.Raja For Respondent: Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.