VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Venkatesan v. The State Represented by the Inspector of Police

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 July 2026
Bench
D.Bharatha Chakravarthyauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 19131/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow D.Bharatha Chakravarthy

Judgment

ORDER The prayer in the Criminal Original Petition is to set aside the order dated

08.07.2026 in Crl MP No.613 of 2026 in SC No.108 of 2024.

¶2The petitioner is facing a case for the offence punishable under Sections 6 and 10 of the POCSO Act along with other offences. The petitioner, who was aged about 60 years, is said to have sexually assaulted the victim child, aged about 14 years. It can be seen from the records that the petitioner had originally filed Crl. MP No.255 of 2026 to recall PW1, the mother of the victim child, PW3, the father of the victim child and PW7, the Investigating Officer. Considering the facts of the case, the Trial Court allowed the application on condition that the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.3,000/- each to PW1 and PW3 and a sum of Rs.5,000/- for PW7. The petitioner did not deposit the costs and did not take any steps and as such, the petition came to be dismissed. Subsequently, this petition is filed on the ground that the petitioner was in prison at the relevant point of time and he has come out of the prison on

18.04.2026 and therefore, could not immediately arrange the payment within time. The Trial Court considered the matter and held that once the earlier petition was dismissed, thereafter the Trial Court has no powers to once again order the same. Page3 of 6

¶3I have considered the arguments of the learned counsel on either side and perused the material records of the case.

¶4Considering the plea made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and in the fair interest of the case, I am of the view that an opportunity to the petitioner to cross-examine the witnesses can be granted since the witnesses do not include the victim child and it is only other witnesses. Even with reference to the same, the petitioner ought to have been diligent enough to deposit the costs in time. In any event, the higher costs is now imposed on the petitioner and the petitioner shall deposit Rs.4,000/- each to PW1 and PW3 and Rs.5,000/- to PW7 and the petitioner shall deposit the amount on or before 05.08.2026.

¶5In view of the aforesaid findings, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed on the following directions:

i) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.4,000/- (Rupees four thousand only) for PWs.1 and 3 and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) for PW7, on or before 05.08.2026.

ii) On such deposit, the order dated 08.07.2026 made in Crl MP No.613 of 2026 shall stand set aside and PWs.1, 3 and 7 shall stand recalled.

iii) The Trial Court shall recall them on a convenient date to the Trial Court and on the same day of the presence of the witnesses, Page4 of 6 without fail, the petitioner has to cross-examine them and complete the same. No further extension of time to pay the amount, nor any adjournment for cross-examination, will be allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 17-07-2026 PVS Page5 of 6 To

¶1The Special Court to deal with cases related to POCSO Act, Vellore, Vellore District

¶2The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Vellore, Vellore District. Crime No.26/2024

¶3The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras CRLoOPoNo.o19131oofo2026 D.BHARATHAoCHAKRAVARTHY,oJ. PVS CRLoOPoNo.o19131oofo2026 17-07-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and CRL.MP.No.12739 of 2026 S.Venkatesan ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State represented by the Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Vellore, Vellore District. Crime No.26/2024 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, praying to set aside the order passed by the Learned Special Court to deal with cases related to POCSO Act, Vellore, Vellore District in Crl MP No.613 of 2026 in SC No.108/2024 by order dated 08-07-2026 and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A. Ajay For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) Page2 of 6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.