VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

K.Jayanthi v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 July 2025
Bench
M. Sundar, Hemant Chandangoudar
Case no.
WP 27743/2024

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M. SundarFollow Hemant Chandangoudar

Judgment

ORDER (made by M. SUNDAR, J.) Subject matter of captioned main 'writ petition' ['WP' for the sake of brevity] is alleged encroachment put up on the '20 feet common road in Survey No.543/1 situated at Dharapadvedu Village, Katpadi Taluk, Vellore District' [hereinafter 'said land ' for the sake of convenience and clarity].

¶2Request for removal of aforereferred alleged encroachments has not yielded results and that has necessitated captioned WP is the submission of learned counsel for writ petitioner.

¶3Ms.M.Rebecca, learned counsel representing Mr.M.Duraimurugan, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner, Mr.T.K.Saravanan, learned Additional Government Pleader for R1 and R2 and Ms.R.Reganitha, learned counsel representing Mr.P.S.Prabhu, counsel on record for R3 are before this Court.

¶4Learned State counsel Mr.T.K.Saravanan, submits, on instructions, that a survey will be conducted within eight weeks from today i.e., on or before

02.09.2025 and if encroachments are found suitable action under appropriate / applicable Statute will be initiated against private respondents and / or other encroachers, if any but Ms.R.Reganitha, learned counsel for R3 submits that if encroachment is found, action will have to be commenced under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 (Tamil Nadu Act 9 of 1999)' {hereinafter 'TNULB Act' for the sake of brevity}. We express no opinion on this but we only record the submission.

¶5If there are encroachments, action against private respondents and/or other encroachers necessarily means that the private respondents would be show-caused. This Court makes it clear that all rights and contentions of private respondents are preserved if they are show-caused. Therefore, this Court does not touch upon the rights of private respondents.

¶6In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned WP is disposed of in the aforesaid manner, recording the stated position of learned State counsel that survey will be done within a period of eight weeks from today, i.e., on or before

02.09.2025 and action if any, under appropriate/applicable statute, will be commenced as expeditiously as the business of official respondents would permit but in any event within a period of eight weeks therefrom i.e., on or before

28.10.2025. There shall be no order as to costs. Captioned WP disposed of in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S., J.) (H.C., J.)

08.07.2025 Index : Yes/No : Yes/No gpa To

¶1The District Collector Vellore District

Collectorate Vellore District

¶2The Tahsildar Katpadi Taluk Office Katpadi Vellore District

¶3The Commissioner Corporation of Vellore Vellore District W.P.No.27743aofa2024 M.oSUNDAR,oJ. and HEMANToCHANDANGOUDAR,oJ. gpa W.P.No.27743oofo2024

08.07.2025 Pagea6aofa6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.07.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR K.Jayanthi ... Petitioner vs. 1. The District Collector Vellore District Collectorate Vellore District 2. The Tahsildar Katpadi Taluk Office Katpadi Vellore District 3. The Commissioner Corporation of Vellore Vellore District 4. S.Saravanan 5. S.Karthikeyan 6. S.Selvam ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachments made by respondents 4 to 6 in the 20 feet common road comprised in Survey No.543/1 situated at Dharapadvedu Village, Katpadi Taluk, Vellore District within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. For petitioner : Ms.M.Rebecca for Mr.M.Duraimurugan For Respondents : Mr.T.K.Saravanan Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 and R2 Ms.R.Reganitha for Mr.P.S.Prabhu for R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.