- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 20 July 2026
- Bench
- C.Kumarappan
- Case no.
- CRL OP 19193/2026
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on
08.06.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 8(c), r/w 22(b), 20(b)(ii)(A), of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, @ u/s.8(c) 22(b), 20(b)(ii)(A) and 29(l) of NDPS Act, in Crime No.664 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page2 of 5
¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused was found in possession of 7.9 grams of Methamphetamine and 300 grams of ganja and 9 numbers of LSD Stamps weighed 0.07 grams. Hence, the case.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 08.06.2026 and is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. It is further submitted that the quantity recovered from him falls under intermediate quantity. Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail.
¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent, while opposing the grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and on instructions, submitted that the petitioner has no bad antecedents.
¶5I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side.
¶6From the submissions of the learned counsel for both sides, this Court is of the view that the quantity involved in the present case is only an Page3 of 5 intermediate quantity and the petitioner has been incarcerated since 08.06.2026. Taking into consideration the nature of the recovery, the period of incarceration, and the absence of any criminal antecedents, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, subject to certain conditions.
¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned learned XIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai - 08, and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the Page4 of 5 conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 20-07-2026 NSL Note:
¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To
¶1The learned XIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai – 08.
¶2Central Prison, Puzhal.
¶3The Inspector of Police, Villivakkam Police Station, Chennai City.
¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o19193oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. NSL CRLoOPoNo.o19193oofo2026 20-07-2026 Page5oofo5
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Suresh ..Petitioner Vs The State Rep.by the Inspector of Police, Villivakkam Police Station, Chennai City, Crime No.664 of 2025 ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.664 of 2025 on the file of respondent police. For Petitioner: Mr.Thangavadhanabalakrishnan For Respondent: Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu (Criminal Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.