Dr.Vinutha Baskar v. The Tahsildar

Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 02.06.2026.

¶2Mr.C.Prabakaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 & 2 and Mr.Durai Gunasekaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the 3rd respondent.

¶3By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 02.06.2026 before the respondent, requesting them to conduct survey and demarcation at the subject land and also Page3 of 6 for fencing therein. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition.

¶5In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of within a period of 6 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.

¶6Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.

¶7In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the respondents 1 & 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 02.06.2026 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, including adjacent land owners, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8It is made clear that this order is passed only for the purpose of issuing a direction to the official respondent for measuring the subject land. If there is any dispute with regard to the title/possession over the said property, the same has to be decided only by way of filing a suit before an appropriate Civil Court. Page4 of 6

¶9As far as the request made with regard to the fencing is concerned, it falls under the private interest of the petitioner and hence, no assistance or protection will be provided by the official respondents for the purpose of fencing the subject property. Therefore, the said request of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

¶10If any police protection is required at the time of conducting survey, the revenue officials are granted liberty to avail the same by approaching the 3rd respondent. In such case, the 3rd respondent shall provide all necessary protection to the revenue officials till the completion of the process of survey the subject land.

¶11With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 23-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order nsa To

¶1The Tahsildar Page5 of 6

¶2The Head Surveyor

¶3The Inspector of Police Shoolagiri Police Station, Shoolagiri-635 119 WPoNo.o29096oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. nsa WPoNo.o29096oofo2026 23-07-2026 Page6oofo6

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Dr.Vinutha Baskar W/o.Dr.M.Baskar, No.13, Surya Hospital, Tank Street, Hosur- 635 109 Krishnagiri District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar 2. The Head Surveyor 3. The Inspector of Police Shoolagiri Police Station, Shoolagiri- 635 119 4. Mallagegowda S/o.Ramachandrappa Halekotta Village and post, Shoolagiri Taluk, ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd Respondents to conduct the survey of the land measuring an extent of 1.28.50 Hectare (3.17 Acres) in Survey No.220, 1.77.50 Hectare (4.38 Ares) in Survey No.221 and Page2 of 6 0.19.00 Hectare (0.47 Acres) in Survey No. 615/11, totally 8.02 Acres, situated at Halekotta Village, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District and demarcate the boundaries by availing the assistant of the 3rd respondent in the event of any obstruction from the private Respondents, based on the petitioners representation dated 02.06.2026,within a time period to be stipulated by this Honble court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Rajkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Prabakaran, Govt. counsel for R1 & 2 Mr.Durai Gunasekaran, Govt. counsel for R3