VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

G.Vijayakumar v. G.Sundararaj

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 August 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
CRP 4577/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed, to direct the Sub Court, Kancheepuram, to number the suit in O.S. S.R. No.5999 of 2026 filed by the petitioner and issue summons to the respondents/defendants.

¶2According to the petitioner, the Sub Court, Kancheepuram, has returned the plaint filed by the petitioner, seeking for partition and permanent injunction, by raising various untenable grounds for rejection.

¶3As seen from the docket orders placed on record, the petitioner's counsel has not been granted an opportunity to argue the matter and try to convince the Court that the suit in O.S. S.R. No.5999 of 2026 is maintainable.

¶4No prejudice will be caused, if a direction is issued to the trial Court, namely the Sub Court, Kancheepuram, to list O.S. S.R. No.5999 of 2026 on the issue of maintainability on a specified date fixed by the Court and permit the petitioner's counsel to argue O.S. S.R. No.5999 of 2026 and try to convince the Court that the partition suit filed by the petitioner is maintainable and if found so maintainable, a direction can be issued by this Court to the trial Court to number the suit and issue summons to the respondents and if the trial Court finds that the suit is not maintainable, a direction will have to be issued by this Court to the trial court to pass a speaking order with regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the maintainability of the suit.

¶5Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of by directing the Sub Court, Kancheepuram, to list O.S. S.R. No.5999 of 2026 for maintainability before the Court on a specified date. On that specified date, the petitioner's counsel shall try to convince the trial Court that the suit filed by the petitioner/plaintiff is maintainable and, if the trial Court gets convinced that the suit is maintainable, the trial Court shall issue summons to the respondents/defendants. Otherwise, the trial Court, while rejecting the suit, shall pass a speaking order with regard to the contentions of the petitioner/plaintiff on the maintainability of the suit.

¶6The aforesaid exercise is directed to be completed by the trial Court within a period of four weeks from the date of re-presentation of the original plaint filed in O.S. S.R. No.5999 of 2026 by the petitioner/plaintiff.

¶7The Registry of this Court is directed to return the original plaint in O.S. S.R. No.5999 of 2026 to the learned counsel for the petitioner to enable the petitioner to re-present the plaint before the trial Court.

¶8Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents, notice to the respondents is dispensed with by this Court. 06-08-2026 ab To The Sub-ordinate Court, Kanchipuram. ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab

06-08-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-08-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1. G.Vijayakumar Petitioner(s) Vs 1. G.Sundararaj 2.G.Selvaraj Respondent(s) PRAYER Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the Subordinate Judge, Kanchipuram to take the plaint on file in OS SR No.5999 of 2026 filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs and Number the Original Suit and to pass such further or other orders as this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Ragupathy For Respondent(s): Notice dispensed with

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.