VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

R.Illayaraja v. The Managing Director

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 March 2025
Bench
M.S. Rameshauthor
Case no.
REV.APLW 24/2023

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.S. Ramesh

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and W.M.P.No.6746 of 2023 Rev.Aplw.No.24 of 2023 R.Illayaraja ...Petitioner Vs

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Salem Ltd., Salem.

2.Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., Rep. by the General Manager, ...Respondents Prayer: Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 r/w Section 114 to review the common order dated

22.04.2022 passed in W.P.No.17921 of 2013 by setting aside the order insofar as it directs the re-payment of 17-B wages to the extent of Rs.11 lakhs in lieu of reinstatement which condition though undertaken is illegal in terms of 17-B and also in view of various Hon'ble Supreme Court judgments and he can ill afford and consequently to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner as per the order of the Special Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.N.G.R.Prasad for M/s.Row and Reddy For Respondents : Mr.M.Aswin, Standing Counsel Rev.Aplw.No.25 of 2023 R.Illayaraja ...Petitioner Vs

1.The Special Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Chennai.

2.Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., Rep. by the General Manager, ...Respondents Prayer: Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 r/w Section 114 to review the common order dated

22.04.2022 passed in W.P.No.20163 of 2013 by setting aside the order insofar as it directs the re-payment of 17-B wages to the extent of Rs.11 lakhs in lieu of reinstatement which condition though undertaken is illegal in terms of 17-B and also in view of various Hon'ble Supreme Court judgments and he can ill afford and consequently to direct the 2nd respondent to reinstate the petitioner as per the order of the Special Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.N.G.R.Prasad for M/s.Row and Reddy For R1 : Mr.A.M.Ayyadurai, Government Advocate For R2 : Mr.M.Aswin, Standing Counsel COMMON ORDER The present Review Applications have been filed to review the common order passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.17921 & 20163 of 2013, dated 22.04.2022.

¶2When the Writ Petitions were pending, the workman appears to have given an affidavit dated 21.04.2021, wherein, among other undertakings, he had agreed to forego his entire back wages and has also undertaken to refund his last drawn wages under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for the period between 01.07.2013 and 05.02.2022.

¶3The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not legally bound to refund the wages paid under Section 17-B of the Act and therefore sought for interference to that portion of the order.

¶4I find some force in the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The respondents, having paid the last drawn wages under Section 17-B of the Act, cannot now seek for refund of the same and any undertaking given by the concerned workman will not be legally binding.

¶5In view of the same, I am inclined to review the common order passed in W.P.Nos.17921 & 20163 of 2013, dated 22.04.2022 and modify the same in the following manner:-

(i) Paragraph 14(iii) of the order dated 22.04.2022 shall stand deleted.

(ii) Paragraph 14(iv) of the order dated 22.04.2022 shall be renumbered as Paragraph 14(iii).

(iii) Paragraph 14(v) of the order dated 22.04.2022 shall be renumbered as Paragraph 14(iv) and substituted as follows:- "The Management shall also pass orders permitting the workman to continue his services, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."

¶6With the above directions, both the Review Applications stand allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

21.03.2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order hvk Note: Issue order copy on 24.03.2025 To

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Salem Ltd., Salem.

2.The Special Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Chennai.

3.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., M.S.RAMESH,J. hvk

21.03.2025

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.