VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

A.Sezhian v. The State Rep. By, the Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 July 2026
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 19799/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 7, 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, challenging the impugned order in Crl.Mp.No.1994 of 2026 dated 16.06.2026 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Chengalpet, in and by which the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 233(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 256(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, was rejected. The petitioner is an accused in Spl.C.C.No.14 of 2026 on the file of the Principal District Court, Chengalpattu.

¶2When the trial was pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate in Spl.C.C.No.11 of 2025, the evidence on the defence side was closed. Thereafter, the case was transferred to the Principal District Court, Chengalpattu, and renumbered as Spl.C.C.No.14 of 2026.

¶3After the transfer, notice was served on the petitioner in the month of January 2026. After a lapse of about six months, the petitioner filed a petition seeking to reopen the defence side evidence to examine another person as D.W.3. Initially, permission was granted to the petitioner to take out summons to secure the presence of one Samson Sugirtharaj. Page3 of 5

¶4Though summons was taken, it could not be served on the said witness as he was not available. Thereafter, when the matter was posted for arguments, the petitioner once again filed an application on 16.06.2026 seeking to examine the said Samson Sughirdharaj as D.W.3.

¶5A perusal of the records reveals that the case had already been posted for arguments. The conduct of the petitioner clearly indicates that the application was filed only to protract the proceedings. Therefore, the trial Court has rightly dismissed the petition. This Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the impugned order warranting interference.

¶6Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 22-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Vv Page4 of 5 To

¶1The Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Chennai City II Detachment

¶2The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. CRLoOPoNo.o19799oofo2026 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,oJ. VV CRLoOPoNo.o19799oofo2026 22-07-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN and Crl.MP.No.13117 of 2026 A.Sezhian S/o. Arumugam, No.15, Bharathi Nagar, Thiru Nagar Extension, Vizhupuram-605 602. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Chennai City II Detachment, (V and AC Cr.No.10/AC/2014/CC II) ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to set aside the Docket order dt.16.06.2026 made in Crl.MP.No.1994 of 2026 in Spl.CC.No.14 of 2026 pending on the file of the Learned Principal District Court,Chengalpet and pass such other order or orders as it may deem fit and necessary and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Deivanandam For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar, Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu (Crl.Side) Page2 of 5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.