VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Chandra v. The District Collector

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
4 March 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 29020/2022

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to restore and reconstruct the house of the petitioner comprised in S.No.561/30 situated at No.2, Lakkampatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District and directing the respondents to pay the damages of Rs.10,00,000/-.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, on

15.07.2022, the respondent had entered into the petitioner's subject land and demolished the house without any prior notice. Hence, this petition.

¶3In reply, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner made an attempt to put up thatched shed at the subject property with a wrong motive to encroach the same. However, the said shed was removed by the Revenue Officials on 15.07.2022. After such removal, an original suit was filed by the petitioner before the District Munsif Court, Mettur. Pending the said suit, the petitioner had reconstructed a house in the subject land. Hence, in this case, the question of restoring and reconstruction would not arise. Therefore, he prays for dismissal of this petition.

¶4Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.

¶5In the case on hand, it appears that initially, the property in Survey No.561/30 was allotted to the petitioner. Thereafter, according to the respondents, the petitioner had encroached the property in Survey No.561/6 and made an attempt to put up a thatched shed therein. The said shed was removed by the Revenue Officials on 15.07.2022.

¶6After the removal of shed, an original suit was filed by the petitioner in OS.No.2 of 2023 before the District Munsif Court, Mettur. Pending the original suit, the petitioner had reconstructed the house. Hence, as rightly contended by the respondent, at this stage, the question of restoration and reconstruction would not arise.

¶7Now, the petitioner seeks the damages of a sum of Rs.10,00,000/-. However, the respondents are denying the allegations made by the petitioner. When such being the case, the only right course available to the petitioner is to agitate his grievance before the District Munsif Court, where the original suit is pending.

¶8In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to interfere in this matter. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed. No cost. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. 04-03-2026 nsa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To

1.The District collector Salem, Salem District.

2.the Sub Collector, Mettur, Salem, Salem District.

3.the Tasildar, Mettur, Mettur Taluk, Salem District.

4.The Revenue Inspector Mettur Taluk, Salem District.

5.The Village Administrative Officer, Lakkampatti Village, Periyathanda, Kolathur, Mettur Taluk, Salem District WPeNo.e29020eofe2022 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. nsa WPoNo.o29020oofo2022 ANDoWMPoNO.o28307o&o28306oOFo2022 04-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY AND WMP NO. 28307 & 28306 OF 2022 Chandra w/o.Appusamy, D.No.2/3-100, C.S.Puram Colony, Chinnathanda, Lakkampatti, Chinnathanda Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District-636 303. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector Salem, Salem District. 2.the Sub Collector, Mettur, Salem, Salem District. 3.the Tasildar, Mettur, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. 4.The Revenue Inspector Mettur Taluk, Salem District. 5.The Village Administrative Officer, Lakkampatti Village, Periyathanda, Kolathur, Mettur Taluk, Salem District Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, Directing the respondents to restore and reconstruct the house of the petitioner comprised in S.No.561/30 situated at No.2, Lakkampatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District and directing the respondents to pay the damages of Rs.10,00,000/ (Rupees ten Lakhs only). For Petitioner(s): M/s. K.Prabhakaran A.Sathasivam For Respondent(s): Mr.A.U.Bharanidharan Agp Takes Notice For Rr1 To 5 Counter Affidavit Filed

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.