Dinesh v. The State Rep by the Inspector of Police

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

17.06.2026 for the alleged offence under Section 123, 62 of BNS Act (Corresponding Section 328, 511 of IPC) and section 21(a), 27(a), 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B), 29(1) of NDPS Act in Crime No.179 of 2026 on the file of the Page1 of 5 respondent police, seeks bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other person were found to be in possession of 400 Tapentadol Tablets and 625 grams of Ganja. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioner.

¶4Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has been incarcerated since 17.06.2026, however, fairly conceded that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. However, he opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioner.

¶5I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record.

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; taking note of the Page2 of 5 submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side); considering the quantity involved is of an intermediate quantity and upon the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Tiruvannamalai, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed Page3 of 5 and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 28-07-2026 SHL Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To:

¶1The Judicial Magistrate-I, Tiruvannamalai

¶2The Central Prison, Vellore

¶3The Inspector of Police, Tiruvannamiai Town Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District

¶4The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras Page4 of 5 CRLoOPoNo.o20254oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPANoJ. SHL CRLoOPoNo.o20254oofo2026 28-07-2026 Page5oofo5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Dinesh ..Petitioner Vs The State Rep by The Inspector of Police Tiruvannamalai Town Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. Crime No.179 of 2026. ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.179 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the Respondent. For Petitioner: Mr.Sathiyaraj E. For Respondent: Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)