Sundaram v. Arulmighu Narasimma Swamy Temple

JUDGMENT Today, the matter is listed under the caption " for reporting settlement".

2.When the second appeal is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant paid the entire rent arrears as demanded by the respondent temple and submitted an application before the Page2 of 4 Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Chennai for his recognition as tenant of the suit property under the respondent temple.

¶3It is seen from the order passed by the Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Chennai in his proceedings vide Na.Ka.No.2233245/2025/M2 dated 20.04.2026, the Trust Board of the respondent temple passed a resolution to recognise the appellant as tenant of the suit property under the respondent temple and also to compromise the second appeal in SA.No.656 of 2020 subject to the sanction by the Commissioner, HR & CE Department. Based on the said resolution passed by the Trust Board of the respondent temple, the Commissioner, HR & CE Department passed an order in the above mentioned proceedings directing the respondent to submit a proposal for recognising the appellant as a tenant of the respondent temple for a period of five years subject to various conditions mentioned in the order.

¶4Since the Commissioner, HR & CE Department already passed an order for recognition of the appellant as tenant of the respondent temple for a period of five years, the learned counsel for the appellant and respondent would submit that no other adjudication is required in this second appeal and the same may be disposed of by recording the order passed by the the Commissioner, HR & CE Department in his proceedings Na.Ka.2233245/2025/M2 dated

20.04.2026. Page3 of 4

¶5Accordingly, the order passed by the Commissioner, HR & CE Department dated 20.04.2026 is recorded and the second appeal stands disposed of as no further adjudication is required. The order passed by the Commissioner, HR & CE Department dated 20.04.2026 shall form part of this order. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. 12-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order nr To

¶1The Additional Sub-Judge, Namakkal

¶2The Additional District Munsif Court, Namakkal.

3.The Executive Officer, Arulmighu Narasimma Swamy Temple Namakkal, Namakkal Town, Namakkal Taluk And District. Page4 of 4

S.SOUNTHAR, J. nr SA No. 656 of 2020 and CMP.No.13508 of 2020 12-06-2026

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR SA No. 656 of 2020 and CMP.No.13508 of 2020 Sundaram ..Appellant(s) Vs Arulmighu Narasimma Swamy Temple Namakkal, Rep By Its Executive Officer, Namakkal Town, Namakkal Taluk And District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer : Second appeal is filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to set aside the Decree and Judgment dated 15.04.2019 made in AS.No. 42 of 2015 on the file of the Additional Sub-Judge at Namakkal confirming the decree and Judgment dated 20.04.2015 and made in OS.No. 1134 of 2004 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Namakkal. For Appellant(s): M/s.Tamilselvi Santhanaraman For Respondent(s): Mr.R. Bharanidharan