VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Minor S.Durgadevi v. C.Raja

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 June 2026
Bench
S Justice T.V.Thamilselviauthor
Case no.
CRP 5438/2025

Judgment

ORDER This petition is filed to set aside the fair and decreetal orders passed on

05.09.2018 in IA No.1496 of 2017 in OS NO.114 of 2010 on the file of the District Munsif, Sankari.

2.The case of the petitioner herein is that the above suit was dismissed for default on 03.06.2026. Hence, the petitioner filed IA No.1496 of 2017 in OS NO.114 of 2010 on the file of the District Munsif, Sankari to restore the suit on file with a delay of 141 days and the same was dismissed on 05.9.2018. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner has come up with this petition.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that when the aforesaid suit was posted for filing of consequential amendment petition to amend the plaint to that effect, it was informed by the petitioner's advocate that the consequential amendment petition can be filed only after boycott is withdrawn by the advocates, whereas the advocate's boycott continued for a long period. Page3 of 4 He further submitted that the petitioners have taken all possible steps to file the restore application, inspite of that there was a delay in proceeding the case. Hence prays to allow this petition.

4.On a perusal of records, it is seen that the petitioners are the legal heirs of the second respondent and they have right over the subject property. Due to lack of communication, they were not unable to contest the suit. Hence, they have filed the application to restore the suit with a delay of 41 days and the same was dismissed on 05.09.2018. Hence, in order to give one more opportunity to the petitioner, this Court is inclined to allow this petition

¶5In view of the above, the order passed in IA No.1496 of 2017 in OS NO.114 of 2010 on the file of the District Munsif, Sankari is set side and the learned Judge is directed to restore the suit in O.S.No.114 of 2010. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed. No order as to costs. 24-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order SMN To. The District Munsif, Sankari. Page4 of 4

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J. SMN 24-06-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI 1. Minor S.Durgadevi D/o. Singaravel, Rep. by Guardian and Next friend Mother Kannammal W/o. Singaravel, Res. at Muslim Street, Kaliyanur Road, Sankari Post, Sankari Taluk, Salem District. 2. Minor S. Vimaladevi D/o. Singaravel, Rep. by Guardian and Next friend Mother Kannammal W/o. Singaravel, Res. at Muslim Street, Kaliyanur Road, Sankari Post, Sankari Taluk, Salem District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. C.Raja S/o. Late Sendrayan, Vellakarattukadu, Travellers Bungalow Road, Sankari Village, Sankari Taluk, Salem District. 2. R.Singaravel S/o. C. Raja, Muslim Street, Kalliyanur Village, Sankari Post, Sankari Taluk, Salem District. 3. R.Murugavel S/o. C. Raja, Res. at Travellers Bungalow Road, Sankari Village, Sankari Taluk, Salem District. 4. Sathyavani D/o. C. Raja, Res. at Travellers Bungalow Road, Sankari Village, Sankari Taluk, Salem District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This petition is filed under Section 115 of C.P.C to set aside the order dated 05.09.2018 made in IA No.1496 of 2017 in OS NO.114 of 2010 on the file of the District Munsif, Sankari. Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): MS.K.VIJAYALAKSHMI FOR M/S.DASS AND VISWA ASSOCIATES For Respondent(s): MS.S.AIYSHWARYA FOR M/S.SARVABHAUMAN ASSOCIATES FOR R4 MR.B.GOPALAKRISHNAN FOR R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.