VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Gopinath v. The State Rep by the Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 July 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 20530/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C.Kumarappan

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

05.06.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 11(iv), 12, 16, 17 of POCSO Act, in Crime No.125 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that when the victim child was studying in the 11th standard, the accused followed her sexually harassed her and Page2 of 5 compelled her to love him. On 10.06.2026 at about 4:30 PM, when the victim child returned home from school, the accused, along with his friends, followed her and sexually harassed her repeatedly.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 05.06.2026 and is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent, while opposing the grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and on instructions, submitted that the statement of the victim under section 183 of BNSS has been recorded.

¶5I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side.

¶6On perusing the statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, except for alleged intimidation, there is no prima facie material in respect of the POCSO Act. Hence, considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner since 05.06.2026 and the absence of any criminal antecedents, this Page3 of 5 Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, subject to certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Dharmapuri, and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; Page4 of 5 [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 30-07-2026 NSL Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

¶1The learned Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Dharmapuri.

¶2The District Jail, Dharmapuri.

¶3The Inspector of Police, Marandahalli Police Station, Dharmapuri District.

¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o20530oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. NSL CRLoOPoNo.o20530oofo2026 30-07-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Gopinath ..Petitioner Vs The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Marandahalli Police Station, Dharmapuri District. Crime No.125/2026. ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.125 of 2026 on the file of Inspector of police, Marandahalli Police Station, Dharmapuri District. For Petitioner: Mr.M.R.Elavarasan For Respondent: Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu (Criminal Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.