VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Gopi v. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 July 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 20588/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

04.07.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B)of NDPS Act in Crime No. 277 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seek bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners were found to be in illegal possession of 1.500 kgs of ganja. Hence, the case. Page2 of 5

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and that they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioners.

¶4Per contra, the learned Government counsel (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioners have been incarcerated since 04.07.20266, however, fairly conceded that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents. However, he opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioners.

¶5I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record.

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; taking note of the submission made by the learned Government counsel (Crl.Side); considering the totality of the circumstances and the fact that the quantity involved is an intermediate one and upon the further fact that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents, this Court is of the firm view that further incarceration of the petitioners for the investigation is not required. Hence, this Court is inclined to Page3 of 5 grant bail to the petitioners subject to certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Mettur, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; Page4 of 5 [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 30-07-2026 SHL Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To:

¶1The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Mettur,

¶2The Inspector of Police Karumalaikudal Police Station, Salem District.

¶3The Central Prison, Salem.

¶4The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras CRLoOPoNo.o20588oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPANoJ. SHL CRLoOPoNo.o20588oofo2026 30-07-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 7IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN 1. Gopi 2. Naveen Kumar ..Petitioner Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by The Inspector of Police Karumalaikudal Police Station, Salem District. Crime No. 277/2026 ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in Crime No. 277 of 2026 on the file of Respondent. For Petitioner: C.Deepakkumar For Respondent: Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.