- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 11 August 2025
- Bench
- G. Jayachandran
- Case no.
- CRL OP 22236/2025
Follow Madras High CourtFollow G. Jayachandran
Judgment
ORDER Petition for bail in Crime No.231 of 2025 for the offences under Sections 126(2), 311, 296(b), 115(2), 351(3), 125, 324(4) of BNS Act, 2023. Page No.1/5
¶2According to the prosecution, the petitioner and his associate waylaid the defacto complainant and robbed a sum of Rs.1000/- at knife point.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated. He states that co-accused has already been granted bail in this case whereas this petitioner has been in prison from 10.07.2025.
¶4The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent police states that there are six previous cases pending against the petitioner and if he is released on bail, he may repeat the crime.
¶5Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent.
¶6Considering the fact that the petitioner is in prison for more than 60 days, final report not yet filed and co-accused already been granted bail, the petition for bail is allowed with certain conditions. Page No.2/5
¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottiyur and on further conditions that : [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer daily at 10.00a.m until further orders. [c] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; Page No.3/5 [d] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.
11.08.2025 nr Note :
¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To
¶1The Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottiyur
¶2The Inspector of Police M8-Sathangadu Police Station.
¶3The Superintendent, Puzhal Prison-II
¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page No.4/5 Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN
, J.
nr
11.08.2025 Page No.5/5
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 11.08.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Ali @ Mohamed Ali ... Petitioner -vs- The state rep by its The Inspector of Police M8- Sathangadu Police Station. Crime No.231 of 2025 ...Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No. 231 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Sugumar For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl.side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.