VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

R.Arasu v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 August 2025
Bench
G. Jayachandranauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 22545/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow G. Jayachandran

Judgment

O R D E R The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.07.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 281, 125(b), 110 BNS and 194(2), 115 of MV Act in Crime No.399 of 2025 on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.

¶2The petitioner herein was arrested in connection with the motor accident wherein the pillion rider of the two wheeler had sustained grievous injury and he is still in hospital.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner is in prison for one month and the investigation is almost completed.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the period of incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur, Thiruvallur, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

[c] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [d] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

22.08.2025 ari Note :

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur, Thiruvallur.

2.The Inspector of Police, T1W Police Station, Avadi.

3.The Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. ari

22.08.2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.08.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN R.Arasu(M/A.25) S/o Rajendhiran No.1, Middle Street, Appanandal, Pilrampattu, Villupuram District 605 701. ..Petitioner/Accused /versus/ State:Rep.by The Inspector of Police, T1W Police Station Avadi ..Respondent/Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023,to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.399 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Avadi, Chennai. For Petitioners :Mr.R.Muthukumar For Respondent :Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.