VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

Sridhar v. Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 August 2025
Bench
G. Jayachandranauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 22336/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow G. Jayachandran

Judgment

ORDER On the complaint given by one Tamilarasi alleging that two persons in two wheeler snatched her hang bag in which she had kept Rs.500/- and Samsung mobile phone along with house key, a case in Crime No.382 of 2025 dated 16.07.2025 was registered for the offences under Sections 304(2) of BNS Act, 2023.

¶2This petitioner was arrested on 21.07.2025 and the handbag, mobile phone, Rs.500/- cash kept in the handbag of the victim was recovered from the accused. The co-accused/A2 is a juvenile. Earlier bail petition before the District Court was dismissed on the ground that investigation is pending.

¶3The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) states that from this petitioner the stolen articles were recovered and investigation is almost completed and likely to file a final report soon.

¶4Recording the same, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶5Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-II, Egmore, Chennai, and on further conditions that : Page No.2/5 [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer as and when required for interrogation. [c] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [d] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

11.08.2025 nr Page No.3/5 Note :

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

¶1The Metropolitan Magistrate-II Egmore, Chennai

¶2The Inspector of Police G-1,Vepery police station Chennai

¶3The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal-I

¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN

, J.

nr Page No.4/5

11.08.2025 Page No.5/5

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 11.08.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Sridhar ... Petitioner -vs- The state rep by its The Inspector of Police G-1,Vepery police station Chennai Crime No.382 of 2025 ...Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No. 382 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, G-1,Vepery police station,Chennai For Petitioner : Mr.T.Hemanth Raj For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl.side) Page No.1/5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.