Paulraj Alias Susai Mariyan v. The State Rep by

O R D E R The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b) & 351(2) of BNS, 2023 r/w Section 4 of TNPHW Act, in Crime No.289 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that there was a dispute between the landlord and tenant, which has led to registration of complaint in Crime No.289 of 2025 by the landlord. The petitioner is a tenant against whom allegations of women harassment, abuse and criminal intimidation made. Hence, the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and ready to furnish sufficient solvent sureties for his release. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner..

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police while opposing for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case.

¶5Heard the learned counsels and perused the materials available on record.

¶6Considering the averment in the complaint and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions;

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, on or before 28.08.2025 before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thiruporur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] if the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate on or before 28.08.2025, this Order shall stand automatically cancelled; [b] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [d] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [e] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

18.08.2025 dna To

1.The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thiruporur.

2.The Inspector of Police, T-19, Kelambakkam Police Station, Tambaram, Chengalpattu District. (Crime No.289 of 2025)

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,

J. dna

18.08.2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.08.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Paulraj @ Susai Mariyan ... Petitioner Vs. The State rep by, The Inspector of Police, T-19, Kelambakkam Police Station, Tambaram, Chengalpattu District. (Crime No.289 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in connection with Crime No.289 of 2025 on the file of respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kingston Jerold For Respondent : Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)