- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 26 August 2025
- Bench
- G. Jayachandran
- Case no.
- CRL OP 22569/2025
Follow Madras High CourtFollow G. Jayachandran
Judgment
O R D E R The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.06.2025, for the offence punishable under Section 9(n) R/W 10 & 11(1), 11(3) R/W 12 of POCSO Act, 2012, in Crime No.21 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that the accused is the petitioner and de-facto complainant is his wife who lodged a complaint against the petitioner alleging that the petitioner is improperly behaving with his minor daughter by showing pornographic films to her and also sexually harassing her while she is in sleep. Hence, the present complaint.
¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that due to some misunderstanding between the husband and wife and also for deferment of daughter who is having an affair with one Praveen, the de-facto complainant gave a false complaint.
¶4This Court to verify the contention of the petitioner counsel directed the learned Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) to produce C.D file.
¶5On perusing the records, this Court finds that the victim child has deferment on showing Tatoo of praveen's name on her chest. The Investigation Officer confirms the fact that the de-facto complainant has a Tatoo of said Praveen on her chest.
¶6The learned Public Prosecutor (Pondy) states that the investigation is pending. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.
¶7Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
¶8Considering the said fact, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.
¶9Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each on or before 10.09.2025 for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Tiruvallur, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall stay away from his residence and shall not contact the victim girl. For the said purpose, he shall report before the Inspector of police, Chinna Kancheepuram daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [d] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.
26.08.2025 nvi Note :
¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To
1.The Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Tiruvallur.
2.The Inspector of Police, The W-34, Ennore AWPS
3.The Superintendent, Central Prison,Puzhal-II
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J., nvi
26.08.2025
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 26.08.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Sasikumar ... Petitioner/Accused Vs. The State Rep. by: The Inspector of Police, The W-34, Ennore AWPS, (Crime No.21 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the case pending investigation in Crime No.21 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Loganathan For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) **********
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.