- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 19 August 2025
- Bench
- G. Jayachandran
- Case no.
- CRL OP 22509/2025
Follow Madras High CourtFollow G. Jayachandran
Judgment
O R D E R The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 17.07.2025, for the offence punishable under Sections 408, 465, 468, 471, 506(ii) of I.P.C, in Crime No.435 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.
¶2The sum and substance of the complaint is that a sum of Rs.40,00,000/- was misappropriated by the petitioner while he was employed as Account and Floor Manager of the defacto-complainant's stores.
¶3According to the complaint, the misappropriation spanned 13 years and the accounts were reconciled only recently, then the misappropriation came to light.
¶4The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent states that the investigation is complete and the final report was filed before the Judicial Magistrate II, Ponneri, on 15.08.2025 through e-filing.
¶5Considering the fact that the investigation is complete and there is no scope for manipulation of records, this Court is inclined to grant bail, subject to certain conditions.
¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri. [b] The sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [c] The petitioner shall report before the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri on every Monday at 10.30 a.m and attend the Court on all every hearing dates without fail [d] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [e] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.
19.08.2025 bsm To
1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri
¶2The Inspector of Police, Redhills Police Station, Chennai.
¶3The Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.
¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Note :
¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,
J. bsm
19.08.2025
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.08.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Ganesh Kumar, M/A40 years. S/o. Muthaiah, No. 23/208, Jeevanathan Road, K.K. Nagar, Kalaiganar Karunanithi Nagar, Chennai - 600 078. ... Petitioner/Accused /versus/ State rep. by: The Inspector of Police, Redhills Police Station, Chennai. (Crime No. 435 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner/accused on bail in Crime No.435 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police pending investigation. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ramamurthy, for Mr.V.Karthick For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Criminal Side) For Intervenor : Mr.Selva Kumar,
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.