The District Collector v. D.Bakiyam

ORDER This Review Petition has been filed to review the order of this Court, dated 27.01.2025, made in W.P.No.2191 of 2025.

2.The grounds on which the Review Petition has been filed is non-joinder of necessary parties and that the review petitioners/respondents in the writ petition were not given adequate time when orders were passed at the time of admission.

3.Heard the learned counsel on either side.

4.The plea of non-joinder has not been taken at the time of hearing the writ petition, nor was a request made for filing a counter in the matter, since the writ petition is one for a mandamus directing the review petitioners to grant patta. This Court has relied on the communications and orders of the review petitioners themselves to issue a mandamus to them. The review petitioners have not made out a case that there is an error apparent on the face of the record __________Page 5 of 6 or that some new fact has come to their knowledge subsequently.

5.Therefore, this Review Petition is dismissed. No costs. 11-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order MKN To Chepauk, Chennai-05. __________Page 6 of 6 P.T.ASHA J. MKN 11-06-2026

__________Page 1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA against Chepauk, Chennai- 05. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. D.Bakiyam 2. S Chinna Vellaiyan 3. Palanisamy 4. R Raman 5. V Paramasivam 6. K Rathinavalli 7. R Leelavathi 8. V Vimala 9. K Rajamanickam 10.V Muthumani 11.C Sivalingam 12.S Vellaiammal 13.V Manickam __________Page 2 of 6 14.V Thangamani 15.C Palanisamy 16.A Kuppan 17.K Lakshmi 18.A Saraswathi 19.A Eswaran 20.T Saradha 21.A Kuppayee 22.G Selvi 23.S Vasanthi 24.S Meena 25.A Veelachi 26.Malliga 27.C Selvam ..Respondent(s) 1. D.Bakiyam 2. S Chinna Vellaiyan 3. Palanisamy 4. R Raman 5. V Paramasivam 6. K Rathinavalli 7. R Leelavathi 8. V Vimala 9. K Rajamanickam 10.V Muthumani 11.C Sivalingam 12.S Vellaiammal 13.V Manickam 14.V Thangamani 15.C Palanisamy 16.A Kuppan 17.K Lakshmi 18.A Saraswathi 19.A Eswaran 20.T Saradha 21.A Kuppayee 22.G Selvi 23.S Vasanthi 24.S Meena 25.A Veelachi __________Page 3 of 6 26.Malliga 27.C Selvam ..Petitioner(s) Vs Chepauk, Chennai- 600 005. ..Respondent(s) Review Petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w. Section 114 of Code of Civil Procedure to review the order dated 27.01.2025 made in W.P.No.2191 of 2025. Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to submit a proposal / report to the 2nd respondent and further direct the 2nd respondent to grant a patta to the petitioners in respect of the land in Survey No. 90 /1, 2 56 /5 at Senkadu, Thalaisolai village, yercaud Taluk, Salem District by considering the petitioners' representation dated 21.08.2018, 05.04.2022, 29.09.2023 and 12.11.2024. __________Page 4 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.R.Balaji Government Advocate For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Elango