Venkatasamy v. The District Collector

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 11.10.2022.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the private respondents intend to lay road in the Vari poramboke. Hence, the petitioner filed the aforesaid representation dated 11.10.2022 to take action against the said private respondents. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondents 1 to 3 till date. Hence, this petition.

¶3In reply, the learned counsel for the official respondent would submit that based on the petitioner's representation, an enquiry was conducted by the official respondents. Upon such enquiry, it appears that the private respondent had not made any attempt to lay road in the subject land and also it was assured by the private respondents that even in future, they will not lay any road therein.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the private respondent had confirmed the submissions made by official respondents and submit that they are not taking any steps to lay road in the subject land.

¶5Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents and also perused the entire materials available on record.

¶6In the case on hand, today, it was submitted by the respondents, both official as well as private respondents, that the private respondents are not taking any steps to lay road in the subject land. When such being the case, no further order is required in this petition.

¶7Therefore, by recording the submissions made by the official and private respondents, this writ petition is closed. No cost. 09-03-2026 nsa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To

1.The District Collector of Krishnagiri, Collectorate, Krishnagiri.

2.The Sub collector Office of the Sub Collector, Hosur, Krishnagiri District-635 103.

3.The Tahsildhar Taluk office, Hosur, Krishnagiri District-635 103. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa

09-03-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY 1. Venkatasamy S/o.Subbarayappa, Alur Village, Baliganapalli Post, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District- 635 103. and 2 Others 2. Anand S/o.Venkatasamy, Alur Village, Baliganapalli Post, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District- 635 103. 3. Subramani S/o.Venkatasamy, Alur Village, Baliganapalli Post, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District- 635 103. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector of Krishnagiri, Collectorate, Krishnagiri. 2.The Sub collector Office of the Sub Collector, Hosur, Krishnagiri District- 635 103. 3.The Tahsildhar Taluk office, Hosur, Krishnagiri District- 635 103. 4.Sankarappa S/o.Kittappa, Kuliganapalli, Agraharam Village, Bagalur Post, Krishnagiri District- 635 103. 5.Krishnappa S/o.venkataramanappa, Alur Village, Baliganapalli Post, Hosur Taluk, Krishangiri District 6.Ramappa S/o.Govindappa, Alur Village, Baliganapalli Post, Hosur Taluk,Krishnagiri District 7.Lakshmana S/o.Govindappa, Alur Village, Baliganapalli Post, Hosur Taluk,Krishnagiri District. 8.Thimmarayappa S/o.Abbaiah, Alur Village, Baliganapalli Post, Hosur Taluk,Krishnagiri District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 namely the District collector of Krishnagiri, The Sub Collector of Hosur to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 11.10.2022 and take action against the Respondents 4 to 8 from laying any road in the Vari poramboke starts from S.No.7 and runs through S.Nos.8,47, 46, 37, 36 and 14 of Alur Village so as to reach the ERI (lake) in S.Nos.16 and 17, Alur Village and Puram Village within a time to be stipulated by this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.P.Vishnu Prasath, for V.Nicholas For Respondent(s): Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP for R1 to 3 Mr.J.Nandagopal for R5 to 8 R-4 No appearance