Chandra Kumar Babu, v. The Assistant Commissioner (St),

ORDER The petitioner challenges an order of cancellation of his GST registration. The petitioner is a proprietorship concern registered under Page2 of 5 the TNGST Act and is an assessee on the file of the respondent. Pursuant to a show cause notice dated 08.11.2022 stating that the petitioner had not filed GST monthly returns regularly, the impugned order was issued. According to the petitioner, the respondent, vide order dated

24.06.2026, has cancelled the registration retrospectively from

01.07.2017 without assigning any independent reason. Therefore, the present writ petition was filed.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cancellation of the GST registration is causing immense hardship and that such cancellation should be revoked. In support of his contentions, he draws reference to the Judgment of this Court in Suguna Cutpiece v. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST)(GST), W.P.Nos.25048 of 2021 batch (Suguna Cutpiece).

¶3Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, learned Special Government Pleader (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. She submits that the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled on account of the petitioner not filing returns regularly. She further submits that the order issued in Suguna Cutpiece was a conditional order and that the petitioner should be directed to comply with all conditions stipulated therein.

¶4In Suguna Cutpiece, this Court directed restoration of GST registration subject to several terms and conditions. The said judgment Page3 of 5 was followed thereafter in many cases. In order to maintain consistency, I am inclined to follow the said judgment.

¶5In the operative portion thereof, the following directions were issued: "i. The petitioner is directed to file her returns for the period prior to the cancellation of registration, together with tax dues along with interest thereon and the fee fixed for belated filing of returns within a period of forty five (45) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. ii. It is made clear that such payment of tax, interest, fine / fee and etc. shall not be allowed to be made or adjusted from and out of any Input Tax Credit which may be lying unutilized or unclaimed in the hands of the petitioner. iii. If any Input Tax Credit has remained unutilized, it shall not be utilised until it is scrutinized and approved by an appropriate or competent officer of the Department. iv. Only such approved Input Tax Credit shall be allowed to be utilized thereafter for discharging future tax liability under the Act and Rules. v. The petitioner shall also pay GST and file the returns for the period subsequent to the cancellation of the registration by declaring the correct value of supplies. Page4 of 5 vi. If any Input Tax Credit was earned, it shall be allowed to be utilised only after scrutinising and approving by the respondents or any other competent authority. vii. On payment of tax, penalty and uploading of returns, the registration shall stand revived forthwith. viii. The respondents shall take suitable steps by instructing GST Network, New Delhi to make suitable changes in the architecture of the GST Web portal to allow the petitioner to file the returns and to pay the tax / penalty / fine. ix. The above exercise shall be carried out by the respondents within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."

¶6The restoration of the GST registration is subject to and conditional upon fulfilling the above conditions.

¶7Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of on the same terms without any order as to costs.

19.08.2026 Index:Yes/No mmi To The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Kuniyamuthur Circle, Coimbatore. WPoNo.o31724oofo2026 SENTHILKUMAR(RAMAMOORTHY,(J. mmi WP(No.(31724(of(2026

19.08.2026 Page5oofo5

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.08.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Chandra Kumar Babu, Proprietor of Vasanth Plast, Site No.12, Ayyappa Nagar 8th Street, Narasimapuram, Vijayalakshmi Mills, Kuniyamuthur,Coimbatore 641 008. ..Petitioner Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Kuniyamuthur Circle, Coimbatore. ..Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned Order in GSTIN No. 33CNKPB78L6ALZG bearing a Ref No. ZA330726090781A dated 10.07.2026 issued by the Respondent and quash the same, and further direct the Respondent to restore the GST registration of the Petitioner vide GSTIN No.33CNKPB7816A1ZG for carrying on the business at the new change of place of business address. For Petitioner: Mr.S.Kannan Mr.Vignesh Kumar K For Respondent: Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, Special Government Pleader (Tax)