K. Venkatesan v. The State Rep by the Inspector Police

O R D E R The petitioner herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 351(3), 329(4), 324(2) & 118(1) of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.263 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2According to the prosecution, due to a dispute between the brothers regarding car parking and drainage, a quarrel arose. The defacto complainant sustained injuries in the attack with an iron rod. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner also sustained injuries in the fight and a case in counter have been registered.

¶4Heard the learned counsels on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶5Considering the nature of the complaint and since custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, on or before 28.08.2025 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Poonamallee, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] if the petitioner fails to surrender before the said Magistrate on or before 28.08.2025, this Order shall stand automatically cancelled; [b] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30.a.m., until further orders; [d] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,

J. rpl [e] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

19.08.2025 rpl To

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Poonamallee.

2.The Inspector of Police, R-11 Ramapuram Police Station, Chennai.

¶3The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.08.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN K.Venkatesan ... Petitioner Vs. The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, R-11 Ramapuram Police Station, Chennai. ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest pending investigation in Crime No.263 of 2025 on the file of respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramajayam For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Criminal Side)