VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Suresh Kumar v. The Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 August 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 21544/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 296(b), 75(2) of BNS read with Section 4 of Women Harassment Act in Crime No.282 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the due to dispute between the parties, the petitioner insulted the de facto complainant using obscene language . Hence the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and a false case has been foisted against the petitioner and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court.

¶4Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and fairly submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Page3 of 6

¶5I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions.

¶6Considering the nature of the allegations and the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, this Court is of the firm view that, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Hence, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail, subject to certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Additional Mahila Judge, Coimbatore on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions:

(a)If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety slip (Judicial Form Page4 of 6 No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identity proofs to ensure their identity;

(c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when required;

(d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

(e) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 06-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order MFA Page5 of 6 To

¶1The Additional Mahila Court, Coimbatore

¶2The Inspector of Police Singanallur Police Station, Coimbatore District.

¶3The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai. CRLoOPoNo.o21544oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. MFA CRLoOPoNo.o21544oofo2026 06-08-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Suresh kumar S/o.Sivalingam, No.3, Jothi Garden, Kalikkanayakan Palayam, Sundapalayam, Coimbatore. ..Petitioner Vs The Inspector of Police Singanallur Police Station, Coimbatore District. Cr.No.282 of 2026 ..Respondent PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 praying to enlarge the Petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.282 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr. T.Balaji For Respondent(s): MR.N.PALANIVEL, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) Page2 of 6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.