VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Senthil Prabhu v. State by the Inspector of Police,

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 February 2026
Bench
Sunder Mohanauthor
Case no.
CRL MP 14023/2024

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Sunder Mohan

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to suspend the Page2 of 5 conviction and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for exclusive trial of cases under POSCO Act, Coimbatore, in Spl.S.C.No.41 of 2020 dated 30.07.2021 pending disposal of the above criminal appeal.

¶2The petitioner/Accused in Spl.S.C.No.41 of 2020 was convicted and sentenced by the Trial Court by judgment dated 30.07.2021 as follows: under Section Sentence imposed 5(m) and 5(n) r/w 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 To undergo RI for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-, (i.d) RI for 2 years. 506(ii) IPC To undergo RI for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-, (i.d) RI for 1 year. Sentences shall run concurrently.

¶3Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed Crl.A.No.228 of 2024 before this Court along with the instant miscellaneous petition seeking suspension of sentence and bail.

¶4The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is known to the victim and had committed the penetrative sexual assault on the victim girl aged 6 years and born on 10.12.2012 after taking her to his house by penetraing his private part in the private part of the victim and thus the petitioner committed the aforesaid offence. Page3 of 5

¶5The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is in custody since 30.07.2021 and has completed nearly 4½ years of the sentence as against the total sentence of 10 years imposed on him; that the petitioner has raised several arguable points in the appeal; that the doctor (P.W.18), who examined the victim on the date of occurrence, specifically observed that there was no evidence of penetrative sexual assault and there were no injuries in the private parts of the victim girl; and therefore prayed for suspension of sentence.

¶6The learned Government Advocate for the respondent would submit that the victim girl has been consistent in her version that there is no reason to disbelieve her evidence; and that no ground has been made out for suspension of sentence.

¶7It is seen that the petitioner has been in custody since

30.07.2021. The Doctor (P.W.18) who examined the victim had opined that there were no external injuries on the victim girl and she was not subjected to any penetrative sexual assault.

¶8Considering the above facts and since the appeal is not likely to be taken up in the near future and the petitioner has served almost half of the Page4 of 5 sentence imposed on him, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of suspension of sentence to the petitioner.

¶9Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands allowed and the sentence imposed on the petitioner is suspended till the disposal of the above Criminal Appeal and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for exclusive trial of cases under POSCO Act, Coimbatore;

(ii)The petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the trial Court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book and mobile numbers to ensure their identity; and

(iii)The petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on the first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m. until the disposal of the appeal and if he is not able to appear before the trial Court on any day, he shall make arrangements to file an application under Section 317 Cr.P.C. and shall appear before the trial Court on any other day in lieu of the date of his absence, as directed by the trial Court. 25-02-2026 MAC Page5 of 5

SUNDER MOHAN, J. MAC To

¶1The Special Court for exclusive trial of cases under POSCO Act, Coimbatore

¶2The Inspector Of Police, All Women Police Station (west), Coimbatore City

¶3The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Coimbatore. Crl MP No. 14023 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.228 of 2024 25-02-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl MP No. 14023 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.228 of 2024 Senthil Prabhu Son of Sampath Kumar, 18/35, Manimegalai Street, Town Hall, Coimbatore. (Now confined at Central Prison, Coimbatore) ..Petitioner(s) Vs State by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station (west), Coimbatore City (Crime No.07/2019) ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 430(1) of BNSS, 2023, to suspend the sentence imposed by the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for exclusive trial of cases under POSCO Act, Coimbatore in Special SC.No.41 of 2020 order dated 30.07.2021 and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the said Criminal Appeal No.228 of 2024 on the file of this Court For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Parthiban For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.