- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 March 2026
- Bench
- G.K. Ilanthiraiyan
- Case no.
- CRL OP 29707/2022
Follow Madras High CourtFollow G.K. Ilanthiraiyan
Judgment
ORDER This criminal original petition has been filed praying to quash the proceedings in STC.No.315 of 2015 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court-II in Poonamallee.
¶2The petitioner is the accused in the complaint lodged by the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 of NI Act on the allegation that the petitioner borrowed loan to the tune of Rs.24,50,000/- and agreed to repay the same by 120 equated instalments. However, the petitioner committed default in payment of equated monthly instalments. While being so, in order to avoid the proceedings under SARFAESI Act, the petitioner issued cheque for a sum of Rs.27,68,995/-. It was presented for collection. However, it was dishonoured for the reason 'funds insufficient'. After causing statutory notice, the respondent lodged complaint for the offence punishable under Section 138 of NI Act.
¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that already the respondent initiated SARFAESI proceedings against the petitioner and the property was also attached. Therefore, the respondent cannot proceed against the prosecution.
¶4Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused all the materials placed before this Court.
¶5On perusal of records, it is revealed that though the respondent initiated proceedings under SARFAESI Act against the petitioner, it is no way connected with the present proceedings. In order to realise the loan amount, the respondent attached the property of the petitioner under SARFAESI Act. The respondent lodged complaint for the offence punishable under Section 138 of NI Act to punish the petitioner. Therefore, the respondent can very well maintain the SARFAESI proceedings as well as Section 138 of NI Act proceedings simultaneously against the petitioner.
¶6In view of the above discussion, this Court finds no grounds to quash the impugned proceedings. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed and the trial court is directed to complete the trial within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
03.03.2026 Index : Yes/No
: Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok To
1.Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court-II in Poonamallee
2.M/s.Equitas Small Finance Bank Limited, Rep. By its Power of Attorney Agent KV.Kumerasan, Spencer Plaza, No.769, 4th Floor, Phase II, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002
03.03.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.29707 of 2022 and Crl.MP.Nos.18217 & 18218 of 2022 Sakthivel.N ... Petitioner Vs. M/s.Equitas Small Finance Bank Limited, Rep. By its Power of Attorney Agent KV.Kumerasan, Spencer Plaza, No.769, 4th Floor, Phase II, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002 ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records relating to proceedings in STC.No.315 of 2015 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court-II in Poonamallee and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Vinoth Kumar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.