VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Manimaran v. The State Rep. By, the Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 August 2026
Bench
N.Rameshauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 21791/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

30.06.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 8(c) 20(b)(ii)(b), 25 and 29(1) of NDPS Act in Crime No.122 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page2 of 6

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused were found to be in possession of 4.2 kg of ganja. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that while he was in arrest, his wife has given birth to his child on 18.07.2026. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioner.

¶4Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has been arrayed as A1 and the recovery from the petitioner is 2.1 kg of ganja. He further submitted that the petitioner has two previous case of which one is similar in nature. He further submitted that charge sheet is yet to be filed. Hence, he opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioner.

¶5Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record. Page3 of 6

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; taking note of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side); considering the totality of the circumstances and considering the fact that his wife has delivered a child on 18.07.2026 and that the charge sheet is yet to be filed and considering the intermediate quantity of contraband, this Court is of the view that further incarceration of the petitioner is not required. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned VI JM At Coimbatore, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; Page4 of 6 [e] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 20-08-2026 SHL Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To:

¶1The VI JM At Coimbatore.

¶2The Central Prison Coimbatore.

¶3The Inspector of police PEW-Coimbatore City police Station. Coimbatore District.

¶4The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras Page5 of 6 CRLoOPoNo.o21791oofo2026 N.RAMESHoJ. SHL CRLoOPoNo.o21791oofo2026 20-08-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.RAMESH Manimaran ..Petitioner Vs The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police PEW-Coimbatore City Police Station, Coimbatore District. ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in Cr.No.122 of 2026 pending on the file of the Respondent. For Petitioner: Mr.K.A.M.Jagadish Kumar For Respondent: Mr.M.M.I.Khaleel Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.