- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 August 2025
- Bench
- G. Jayachandran
- Case no.
- CRL OP 23155/2025
Follow Madras High CourtFollow G. Jayachandran
Judgment
O R D E R The petitioner alleged to have been gone to the house of the defacto complainant wearing burqa under the protest of distributing invitation had gain entry into the house and thereafter, attacked the defacto complainant
and her daughter and locked them in a room and broke open the Almirah had stolen 31 sovereigns of jewels.The respondent police has registered complaint on 31.07.2025 for the offence under Section 309(4) of BNS Act and he was arrested on 05.08.2025.
¶2Based on his confession statement, the stolen jewels were recovered. This petitioner claims that he is sister's husband of the defacto complainant and he has been falsely implicated in this case.
¶3Considering the fact that the stolen articles recovered, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
¶4Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambur, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30.a.m., until further
orders; [c] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [d] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.
28.08.2025 Vv Note :
¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To
¶1The Judicial Magistrate, Ambur
¶2The Inspector of Police, Ambur Town Station, Tirupathur District.
¶3The Central Prison, Vellore.
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. Vv
Crl.O.P.No.23155 of 2025
28.08.2025
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.08.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.O.P.No.23155 of 2025 Tanveer Ahmed ... Petitioner Vs. State rep by The Inspector of Police, Ambur Town Station, Tirupathur District. ... Respondent (Cr.No.194 of 2025) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.194 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Dhasarathan For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.