- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 22 August 2025
- Bench
- G. Jayachandran
- Case no.
- CRL OP 23412/2025
Follow Madras High CourtFollow G. Jayachandran
Judgment
O R D E R The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 03.08.2025, for the offence punishable under Section 123 of BNS r/w Section 24(1) of Cigarette and other Tobacco Products Act, 2023, in Crime No.467 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found to be in possession of 8.400 kilograms of banned Tobacco Products in his shop. Hence, the present complaint.
¶3The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the seized products had been sent for analysis and the analysis report is awaited. The market value of the seized products is around Rs.3,360.
¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no previous case against him.
¶5Considering the submissions made on either side, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.
¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on depositing a sum of Rs.4,000/- (Rupees Four Thousand only) in the account pertaining to Crime No.467 of 2025 within a period of fifteen days. On such deposit, the surety may be considered and on further conditions that: [a] The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kallakurichi; [b] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [d] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [e] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.
22.08.2025 drl Note :
¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To
1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kallakurichi
2.The Station House Officer, Kallakurichi Police Station, Kallakurichi District.
3.The Sub Jail, Kallakurichi.
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. drl
22.08.2025
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.08.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Perarasan ... Petitioner Vs. The State rep by, Station House Officer, Kallakurichi Police Station, Kallakurichi District. (Crime No.467 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in pending investigation in Crime No.467 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Gunasekar For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.