VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ranjith v. The State Rep By, the Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
19 August 2026
Bench
N.Rameshauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 22384/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow N.Ramesh

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

19.07.2026 for the alleged offence under Section 123 and 275 of BNS and under Section 20(2) of the Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003 in Crime No.313 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page2 of 5

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was alleged to found in possession of 8.100 kgs of banned tobacco products namely Hans, Vimal Pan Masala and V1 Tobacco. Hence, this case.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioner.

¶4Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed the grant of bail on the ground that the petitioner has one previous case, similar in nature pending against him. Hence, he oppose the grant of bail to the Petitioner.

¶5I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record.

¶6From the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, it is seen that though the petitioner has one previous case, similar in nature, Page3 of 5 considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner, this Court is of the firm view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Hence, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail on certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palladam, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 Page4 of 5 SCC 283]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 19-08-2026 DRL Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Palladam.

¶2The Inspector of Police Avinashipalayam Police Station, Tiruppur District.

3.The Superintendent, Palladam Sub jail.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o22384oofo2026 N.RAMESH,oJ. DRL CRLoOPoNo.o22384oofo2026 19-08-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.RAMESH Ranjith S/o. Seenivasan Kuttaiyan, No.519, South Street, Velangudipatti, Kulathur Taluk, Vathanakurichi, Tirumalairayapuram, Pudukkottai 622 504. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police Avinashipalayam Police Station, Tiruppur District. Crime No. 313/2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime NO. 313 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): M/s. Deepanuday For Respondent(s): Mr.M.M.I.Khaleel, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.