VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

T. Ayyasamy Jain v. T.R. Ganesh

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 December 2025
Bench
C.V. Karthikeyan, K.Kumaresh Babuauthor
Case no.
AS 771/2023

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C.V. KarthikeyanFollow K.Kumaresh Babu

Judgment

JUDGMENT (Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan J.) The appeal came up for consideration on 04.12.2025. The appellant appeared as party-in-person. The following was the order passed on 04.12.2025: "The appeal arises from a suit for Specific Performance. The suit had been decreed. The defendant in the suit is in appeal before this Court.

¶2Under the agreement, the total sale consideration for conveying the property was Rs.75,00,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Lakhs only). An advance amount of Rs.35,00,000/-(Rupees Thirty Lakhs only) had been paid. After the decree, the balance sum of Rs.40,00,000/-(Rupees Forty Lakhs only) had also been deposited in Court. Naturally, that amount has now gathered interest. However, the sale deed will have to reflect the amount agreed between the parties and the consideration they had agreed, namely Rs.75,00,000/-. To that extent, the sale deed may be executed.

¶3Independent of this, the accrued interest amount may be paid to the appellant namely T.Ayyasamy Jain, S/o.Jeenadoss Jain by the Additional District Court / Fast Tract Court (FTC), Arani, Thiruvanammalai, where the amount has been deposited to the credit of O.S.No.22 of 2017. A direction is given that the balance sale consideration of Rs.40,00,000/- (Rupees Forty Lakhs only) together with the accrued interest, must be released to the appellant herein on proper identification by the Additional District Court / Fast Tract Court (FTC), Arani, Thiruvanammalai, even without issuing notice to the plaintiff in the suit, provided the appellant herein/defendant in the suit executes the sale deed.

¶4In view of the settlement reached between the parties, the appellant would also be entitled for refund of Court fees as paid before this Court as per rules, since the matter has been settled by the parties, exercising due prudence.

¶5For Reporting Compliance, list the matter before this Court on 09.12.2025.

¶2It is reported today that in compliance with the directions, the sale deed had been executed on 08.12.2025 in the office of the Joint Sub-Registrar-II, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶3Since there has been compliance of execution of the sale deed, the Execution Petition filed by the respondent herein in E.P.No.10 of 2025, which is now pending before the Additional District Court, Arani, Thiruvannamalai District, no longer survives and the same is dismissed by this Court.

¶4However, in the Execution Petition, there has been a deposit of Rs.40,00,000/- (Rupees Forty Lakhs only), which has also accrued interest. The said amount of Rs.40,00,000/-(Rupees Forty Lakhs only) together with accrued interest is payable to the appellant herein, Mr.T.Ayyasamy Jain, S/o.Jeenadoss Jain.

¶5If a memo is filed by Mr.T.Ayyasamy Jain, S/o.Jeenadoss Jain, before the trial Court, seeking return of the said amount of Rs.40,00,000/- (Rupees Forty Lakhs only) together with interest, even without issuing notice, the learned trial Court may direct return of the said amount deposited to Mr.T.Ayyasamy Jain, S/o.Jeenadoss Jain.

¶6Since the parties have entered into a settlement, the appellant herein is also entitled for refund of Court fees in the appeal suit.

¶7In the result, the appeal suit stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (C.V.K., J.) (K.B., J.) 09-12-2025 Note: Issue order copy on 09.12.2025. Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes kak To:

1.The Additional District Court (FTC), Arani, Thiruvannamalai.

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

3.T.R. Ganesh S/o. T.R.Ramachandran, No. 4/443, Kanniyamman Koil Street, Kizhpudhupakkam Extension, Cheyyar Town, Cheyyar Taluk, Tiruvannamalai Dist. C.V.KARTHIKEYAN J. and

K.KUMARESH BABU, J. kak

09-12-2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU and C.M.P.No.26992 of 2023 1. T. Ayyasamy Jain S/o. Jeenadoss Jain, No.10, Kaveri Street Alias Kanniyamman Koil Street, Ellappa Nagar, Cheyyar Town, Tiruvannamalai Dist. resided at 42/36, Kulakarai St, Pachaiyamman Koil St, Near Devi Easwari Home, 2nd Floor, D.No. 5, Thirumullaivoyil, Chennai 600 062, Now residing at D.No. 5, Venkatachalapathy Cross Street, Rajakilpakkam, Kamarajapuram, Chennai 600 073 Appellant(s) Vs T.R. Ganesh S/o. T.R.Ramachandran, No. 4/443, Kanniyamman Koil Street, Kizhpudhupakkam Extension, Cheyyar Town, Cheyyar Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. Respondent(s) Prayer: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 26.07.2023 in O.S.No.22 of 2017 on the file of the Additional District Court (FTC), Arani, Tiruvannamalai. For Appellant : For Respondent(s): T.Ayyasamy Jain (Party-in-Person) Mr.B.Jawahar

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.