VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

C.P.Munikrishnappa v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 March 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 30506/2024

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.09.2020.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner has given a representation dated 01.09.2020 to implement the order passed by the second respondent in his office Ref.Na.Ka.1330/2020/P3 dated 06.07.2020 and restore the name of the petitioner's father viz., Chinnapillappa in the revenue records such as patta, chitta and 'A' Register with respect to the lands measuring 0.35.0 hectares in S.No.51/1B, 0.14.5 hectares in S.No.51-3B1B1 and 0.55 hectares in S.No.56/2, Peddakullu Village, Kelavarapalli Taraff, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District, by deleting the names Gowramma and Venkatesh. However, the said representation was not considered by the respondents, as on date. Hence, this petition. Page3 of 4

¶3In reply, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the petitioner's representation dated

01.09.2020 will be disposed of by the third respondent.

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶5In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the third respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 01.09.2020, after serving due notice and affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner as well as respondents 4 to 8 and aggrieved parties if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No cost. 12-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VM Page4 of 4

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM To:

¶1The District Collector Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri-635 001.

¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hosur-635 109, Krishnagiri District.

¶3The Tahsildar, Hosur Taluk, Hosur-635 109, Krishnagiri District. 12-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY C.P.Munikrishnappa ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri-635 001. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hosur- 635 109, Krishnagiri District. 3. The Tahsildar, Hosur Taluk, Hosur- 635 109, Krishnagiri District. 4. Subramani 5. Gangadaran 6. Muninagamma 7. Anitha 8. Venkatesh ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to implement the order passed by the 2nd respondent in his office Ref.Na.Ka.1330/2020/P3 dated 06.07.2020 and restore the name of the Petitioner's father namely Chinnapillappa in the revenue records such as patta, chitta, and 'A' Registrar with respect to the lands measuring 0.35.0 hectares in S.No.51/1B, 0.14.5 Page2 of 4 Hectares in S.No.51-3B1B1 and 0.55 hectares in S.No.56/2, Peddakullu Village, Kelavarapalli Taraff, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District by deleting the names Gowramma and Venkatesh. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.P.Mani For Respondent(s) : Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP for R1 to 3 Mr.C.Prabakaran for R4 to 7

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.