VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M/S.Ots Finance Limited v. The Authorized Officer

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 June 2026
Bench
The Chief Justice, G.Arul Murugan
Case no.
WP 30296/2024

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by The Chief Justice) This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus declaring that the schedule property belonging to the petitioner is not a subject property/secured asset under SARFEASI proceedings with respect to the Mortgage Loan borrowed by the 2nd respondent under Loan Account Numbers 001931100000830, 001930100026847, 00193000024964, 001930100029349, 001913046021708, 001930100018918, 001930100029367 and consequently direct respondents 1, 3 and 4 not to interfere in any manner whatsoever with the schedule property of the petitioner

¶2The petitioner is a private Financial Company, which had extended financial assistance to the private respondents 2 to 4 to the tune of Rs.30,00,000/- through RTGS fund transfer. The second respondent executed a receipt dated 07.10.2020 for Rs.30,00,000/-. Page3 of 5

¶3The property in question is already mortgaged with the first respondent. Earlier, the petitioner had approached the civil court by way of Civil Suit in O.S.No.3094 of 2024 on the file of Principal Sub Court, Pudhucherry. The said suit was dismissed on the ground of maintainability as the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is barred under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act and, accordingly, the plaint was not taken on file.

¶4The petitioner, without approaching the Debts Recovery Tribunal, has approached this court seeking to declare that the schedule property is not the subject property/secured asset under the SARFAESI proceedings and to consequently direct the first, third and fourth respondents not to interfere with the property in any manner.

¶5The relief sought in this writ petition cannot be granted in view of the fact that the petitioner is having an efficacious alternative statutory remedy of approaching the Debts Recovery Tribunal under the SARFAESI Act. Accordingly, this writ petition, being not maintainable, is dismissed. No order as to costs. The connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, C.J.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN J.) 29-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order ssk Page4 of 5 To

¶1The Authorized Officer Union Bank Of India, Assets Recovery Branch, Elcanso Building, No.9, Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008

¶2Y.Vijaya Baskar Managing Director, M/s.Sri Chakra Lubes Pvt Ltd, Administrative Office at G-3B, 25, Mannar Street, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017 WPoNo.o30296oofo2024 SUSHRUToARVINDoDHARMADHIKARI,oC.J. AND G.ARULoMURUGAN,oJ. ssk WPoNo.o30296oofo2024 29-06-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and WMP Nos.32977 and 32979 of 2024 M/s.OTS Finance Limited Rep By its Authorised Signatory, K.Gopala Rathnam, having its Registered Office at 40-06-24 Hotel Fortune Murali Park Road, Vijayawada-520 008 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Authorized Officer Union Bank Of India, Assets Recovery Branch, Elcanso Building, No.9, Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008 2. Y.Vijaya Baskar Managing Director, M/s.Sri Chakra Lubes Pvt Ltd, Administrative Office at G-3B, 25, Mannar Street, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017 3. Vaithianathan 4. R.Amsa ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus declaring that the schedule property belonging to the Page2 of 5 petitioner is not a subject property/secured asset under SARFEASI proceedings with respect to the Mortgage Loan borrowed by the 2nd respondent under Loan Account Numbers 001931100000830, 001930100026847, 00193000024964, 001930100029349, 001913046021708, 001930100018918, 001930100029367 and consequently direct the respondents 1, 3 and 4 not to interfere in any manner whatsoever with the schedule property of the petitioner For Petitioner(s): Mrs. K.Subhashini Suresh For Respondent(s): No Appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.