S.Dinesh v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b) (ii) (B) and 29(1) of the NDPS Act, in Crime No.164 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. Page2 of 5

¶2The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with other accused persons were found in illegal possession of 1.300 kilograms of ganja, resulting in the registration of a case.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person. He further submitted that he has been falsely implicated in this case and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition imposed by this court. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution's case submitted that the petitioner/A4 is absconding the A1 to A3 were already arrested and remanded. The contraband recovered from them weighs about 1.300 kilograms of ganja. This petitioner has two previous cases pending against him out of which one is filed under Section 302 of IPC and investigation has not yet been completed and hence, he opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. Page3 of 5

¶6Considering the submissions of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), and the other accused A1 to A3 were already arrested and this is a case involving recovery of 1.300 kgs of ganja and that the petitioner has two previous cases pending against him out of which one is filed under Section 302 of IPC which clearly demonstrates that if bail is granted, there is a likelihood of the petitioner misusing the liberty and thereby subverting the course of justice. Hence, this Court is of the view that the petitioner does not deserve the grant of bail.

¶7Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 14-08-2026 GV To

¶1The Inspector of Police, Sriperumbudur Police Station, Kancheepuram District.

¶2The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o22773oofo2026 N.RAMESH,oJ. GV CRLoOPoNo.o22773oofo2026 14-08-2026 Page4oofo5 Page5 of 5

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.RAMESH S.Dinesh S/o.Suriya, No 44 Kiziyanda Street, Katchipattu, Sriperumbudur, Kanchipuram-602105. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Sriperumbudur Police Station, Kancheepuram District. Crime No.164 of 2025 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER:Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to grant Anticipatory Bail in the event of their arrest by the Respondent Police in respect of the Crime No.164 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Saran Raj For Respondent(s): Mr..R.Rajasekaran, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side)