V.Jeeva Rekha v. The Director General of Police

O R D E R After arguing the case at the length for considerable time and on this Court noticing that the petitioner did not avail the remedy of appeal provided under Rule 28 of CRPF Rules, 1955, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition, with liberty to avail remedy of appeal as provided under the Rules.

¶2Though a submission is made on behalf of the petitioner to save the limitation by excluding the period, during which the present petition is pending before this Court, it is noted that the present Writ Petition has been filed on 04.11.2019, while the impugned order is dated 11.01.2018 and the appeal in terms of Rule 28 of CRPF Rules, being required to be filed within 30 days, this Court is of the view that the limitation cannot be saved, in terms of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. However, since, power is conferred with the Appellate Authority to entertain the time barred, appeal by condoning the delay on the said authority deem it fit, in the event the petitioner preferring an appeal and seeking condonation of delay in filing such appeal, the Authority is directed to exclude the period spent by the petitioner in pursuing the present Writ Petition from the date of filing i.e.,

04.11.2019 to till date.

¶3Subject to the above liberty, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

06.11.2025 Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No : Yes / No dh To

¶1The Director General of Police, Directorate General, CRPF, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003.

¶2The Special Director General of Police, South Zone HQr., GC, CRPF, Chandrankutta, Hyderbad – 500 005.

¶3The Inspector General of Police, Southern Sector CRPF, Road No.10C, Jubilee Hills, Near MLA/MPs Colony Gayathri Hills, Hyderabad – 500 033.

¶4The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, CRPF, Ranga Reddy – 500 078 Telangana

¶5The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, CRPF, Avadi, Chennai – 600 065.

¶6The Deputy Commissioner of the Police, Pulianthope District, Ottary, Chennai – 600 012. T. VINOD KUMAR

, J.

dh

06.11.2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.11.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR V.Jeeva Rekha ... Petitioner vs 1. The Director General of Police, Directorate General, CRPF, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003. 2. The Special Director General of Police, South Zone HQr., GC, CRPF, Chandrankutta, Hyderbad – 500 005. 3. The Inspector General of Police, Southern Sector CRPF, Road No.10C, Jubilee Hills, Near MLA/MPs Colony Gayathri Hills, Hyderabad – 500 033. 4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, CRPF, Ranga Reddy – 500 078 Telangana 5. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, CRPF, Avadi, Chennai – 600 065. 6. The Deputy Commissioner of the Police, Pulianthope District, Ottary, Chennai – 600 012. … Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue Writ of Cetriorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 11.01.2018 of the fourth respondent in proceedings No.P.VIII-3/2014-GC RRY-EC-2 by which the petitioner was dismissed from service in exparte and quash the same directing the respondents to accept her resignation from service and take action for drawal of her entitled dues on account of pay and allowances, transfer allowance and other dues and pass orders. For Petitioner : Ms.R.Meenakshi For Respondents : Mr.K.Suba Ranga Bharathi Central Government Standing Counsel