G.Manikandan v. The Inspector General of Registration,

ORDER The Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 5 to cancel the forged Gift Settlement Deeds vide Document Nos. 441/2002 and 14/2003.

¶2According to the petitioner, the Gift Settlement Deeds vide Document Nos. 441/2002 and 14/2003 were forged one. Therefore, the petitioner has given a representation on 20.06.2025 seeking cancellation of the said deeds. However, the official respondents have not considered the same till date. Hence, the present Writ Petition has been filed. Page2 of 6

¶3In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that now, the validity of Sections 77A and 68(2) of the Registration Act, 1908, was struck down by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 02.08.2024 in W.P.No.10291 of 2022. In such case, the registered Gift Settlement Deeds cannot be cancelled in the absence of a decree or order obtained from a competent Court of law. Hence, he would submit that now, the only recourse available to the petitioner is to file a suit before the concerned Civil Court either seeking cancellation of the aforesaid allegedly fraudulent settlement deeds or a declaration to declare the same as 'null and void'. Consequently, he prays for the dismissal of the present writ petition.

¶4Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents and also perused the entire materials available on record.

¶5In the case on hand, a representation was given by the petitioner, requesting the officials respondents to cancel the allegedly forged Gift Settlement Deeds registered as Document Nos. 441/2002 and 14/2003. However, the said representation has not been considered by the official respondents till date. Page3 of 6

¶6As rightly contended by the respondent, the validity of Section 77A and 68(2) of the Registration Act, 1908, was struck down by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 02.08.2024 in W.P.No.10291 of 2022. In such case, the respondents will not have any power to cancel the gift deed.

¶7When such being the case, the only recourse available to the petitioner is to approach an appropriate Civil Court either for cancellation of aforesaid fraudulent gift deed or to declare the same as "null and void". The present petition cannot be entertained by this Court.

¶8Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed. The petitioner is granted liberty to file a suit, for cancellation of gift deed, before the appropriate Civil Court. There shall be no order as to costs. 10-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Asi Page4 of 6 To

¶1The Inspector General Of Registration, Office Of The Inspector General Of Registration, Chennai.

¶2The Additional Inspector General Of Registration, Office Of Inspector General Of Registration, Chennai.

¶3The Zonal Deputy Inspector General Of Registration, Office Of The Deputy Inspector General Of Registration, Cuddalore Zonal, Cuddalore.

¶4The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Tindivanam, .

¶5The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Valathi. Page5 of 6 WPoNo.o32934oofo2025 KRISHNANoRAMASAMY,oJ. Asi WPoNo.o32934oofo2025 10-06-2026 Page6oofo6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY G.Manikandan S/o.Godhandaraman, Vaniyar Street, Melmalaiyanur Taluk And Post, Villuppuram District -604 204. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector General Of Registration, Office Of The Inspector General Of Registration, Chennai. 2. The Additional Inspector General Of Registration, Office Of Inspector General Of Registration, Chennai. 3. The Zonal Deputy Inspector General Of Registration, Office Of The Deputy Inspector General Of Registration, Cuddalore Zonal, Cuddalore. 4. The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Tindivanam, . 5. The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Valathi. 6. Iyappan, S/o.Ramchandran, Iyyan Store, Avalurpettai Road, Melmalayanur Bus Campus, Melmalaiyuanur, Villupuram District -604 204. ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 6 PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 5 to cancel the forged Gift Settlement Deeds vide Document Nos. 441/2002 and 14/2003 executed with forged documents and concealment of the facts by the 6th respondent, based on the petitioner's representation dated 20.06.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr. K.Prabhakaran For Respondent(s): Mr. Roshan Atiq M. Government Counsel for R1 to R5 Mr.B.Jawahar for R6