- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 June 2026
- Bench
- S. Sounthar
- Case no.
- CMP 682/2024
Follow Madras High CourtFollow S. Sounthar
Judgment
ORDER This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 1052 days in filing the second appeal.
¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner by taking this court to the averment contained in the affidavit and the additional affidavit dated 06.04.2026 submitted that due to the age of the petitioner and the Covid lockdown, she was prevented from filing the second appeal within the time limit.
¶3The respondents 3 and 4 as well as the 5th respondent filed their separate counter in the condone delay petition.
¶4The learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the averments contained in the affidavit filed in support of the condone delay petition cannot be considered as sufficient cause, within the meaning of Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
¶5It is seen from the affidavit filed in support of the petition that the first appeal was disposed of on 29.07.2019 and the copy application was filed on
31.07.2019 and the copies were made ready on 23.10.2019. It is stated by the petitioner that she is aged about 70 years, suffering from age related ailments Page2 of 4 and hence, she could not contact her counsel immediately after disposal of the first appeal. It is further stated by the petitioner that during the month of January 2020, Covid virus started spreading and therefore, the family members of the petitioner restrained her from going outside. Subsequently, lock down was announced in March 2020 and it continued with some relaxation till
28.02.2022. The petitioner also stated that she was affected with Covid twice during the lockdown period and she was confined to hospital and hence, she could not contact her counsel. After due recovery, the petitioner had taken steps to file the second appeal and the same was filed on 06.12.2022.
¶6Having regard to the reasons narrated in the affidavit, dated 06.04.2026 filed along with the petition, this court is inclined to take liberal view of the matter and to condone the delay of 1053 days in filing the present appeal.
¶7Accordingly, this petition is allowed, on condition, the petitioner pays a sum of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees one thousand) to the credit of 'Chief Justice Relief Fund', within a period of one week from today, failing compliance, this petition shall stand automatically be dismissed.
¶8In case, the above said condition is complied with, within the stipulated time, Registry is directed to number the second appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission. 05-06-2026 MST Page3 of 4 CMPoNo.o682oofo2024oino SAoSroNo.137516oofo2022 S.SOUNTHAR,oJ. MST o CMPoNo.o682oofo2024oino SAoSroNo.137516oofo2022 05-06-2026 Page4oofo4
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR C. Kanchana W/o. V.K. Chandrasekaran, No. 14, Muduppiah Colony, Veerakeralam, Coimbatore - 641 007. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. V.B. Viswanathan, S/o.V.T.Balasubramaniam, 2. B.Loganathan, S/o.V.T.Balasubramaniam, 3. L.Samyuktha, D/o.B.loganathan, 4. L.Devatha, D/o.B.Loganathan, R1 to R4 are residing at No.34, Oorgounder St, Veerakeralam, Coimbatore 641007. 5. G.Murugesan, S/o.Gurusamy, No.36, Subramaniapuram, Venkittapuram, Coimbatore 641025. ..Respondent(s) prayer: This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to the condone the delay of 1052 days in filing this Second Appeal. For Petitioner(s): Mr.N. Krishnakumar for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates For Respondent(s): Mr. K.Venkateswaran for R5 Mr.M.N.Balakrishnan for R3 and R4 Page1 of 4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.