- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 24 March 2026
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- WP 33960/2022
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy
Judgment
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.07.2022.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner has given a representation dated 27.07.2022 to restrain the Respondents 2 to 4 from making any further registration / encumbrance in accordance with the schedule mentioned property situated at Kanikkiluppai village, comprised in S.No.219 of measuring an extent of 2.78 Acres out of 2.95 Acres and S.No.219/6 measuring an extent of 0.68 Acres out of 0.72 Acres, totally measuring ((i.e) 2.78 + 0.68 = 3.46) 3.46 Acres out of 3.67 Acres, Arani, Taluk (North Arcot District) and old Survey No. 227/92 Ares 1.40 in 2.12 in New survey No. 187/4 Acres 1.40 in 2.0.3 in the Sub Registration District of the Arani.
¶3Per contra, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the 1st respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation was not filed Page3 of 4 in a proper format and no fee as prescribed under the law has been paid by the petitioner therefore, the respondents are not in a position to consider the same.
¶4Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the 1st respondent and also perused the materials available on record.
¶5In view of the submissions made, this Court directs the petitioner to file a proper protest petition along with proper fee. In such case, the 1st respondent is directed to consider the same and if any document is sought to be registered, the same may be registered after issuing notice to the petitioner and necessary parties.
¶6With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 24-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order KKN Page4 of 4
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. KKN To The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Arani, Tamil Nadu 632 301. 24-03-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY K.Senthil ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State Represented by The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Arani, Tamil Nadu 632 301. 2. A. venkatesan 3. Geetha 4. J. K. Sundar ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the 1st Respondent to consider the Representation dated 27.07.2022 to restrain the Respondents 2 to 4 from making any further registration / encumbrance in accordance with the schedule mentioned property situated at Kanikkiluppai village, comprised in S.No.219 of measuring an extent of 2.78 Acres out of 2.95 Acres and S.No.219/6 measuring an extent of 0.68 Acres out of 0.72 Acres, totally measuring ((i.e) 2.78 + 0.68 = 3.46) 3.46 Acres out of 3.67 Acres, Arani, Taluk (North Arcot District) and old Survey No. 227/92 Ares 1.40 in 2.12 in New survey No. 187/4 Acres 1.40 in 2.0.3 in the Sub Registration District of the Arani. Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Ms.S.Menaka For Respondent(s): Ms.K.Aswini Devi Additional Government Pleader for R1 R2 to R4 – Notice served- No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.