- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 27 March 2026
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- WP 32547/2023
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition is filed to direct the concerned respondents 1 to 7 to grant compensation for the land acquired in Survey Nos.169/5 and 170/3 of Orappam Village, Bargur Taluk and Krishnagiri District.
¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the owner of the subject lands, which are ancestral in nature. A portion of the said lands was acquired by the respondents for the purpose of canal formation. Despite such acquisition and utilisation of the petitioner's lands, no compensation has been paid to the petitioner. He further submitted that the petitioner has been continuously pursuing the matter by making several representations to the concerned authorities from time to time, requesting payment of compensation in accordance with law. Though certain steps were stated to have been taken, no final decision has been communicated and the Page3 of 5 petitioner has not been granted the compensation due to him, while similarly placed landowners have been paid. Hence, the petitioner prayed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.09.2023 and pass appropriate orders.
¶3Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 7 would submit that the petitioner's representation dated 09.09.2023 will be considered by the concerned respondents within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.
¶5Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the concerned respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 09.09.2023, after issuing due notice and opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner as well as the private respondent and aggrieved parties, if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. At the time of personal hearing, the petitioner is directed to submit all relevant documents before the concerned respondent. Page4 of 5
¶6With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 27-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VM To
1.The Chief Engineer Water Resource Department, Chennai Division, Chennai-600 005.
2.The Superintendent Engineer, Water Resource Department, Pennaiyaru Division, Thiruvannamalai-606 603.
3.The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department / Water Resource, Mel Pennaiyaru Water Division, Dharmapuri-636 705.
4.The Assistant Engineer, Water Resource Department, Pennaiyaru Division, Krishnagiri - 635 001.
5.The District Collector, Krishnagiri - 635 115.
6.The Revenue Divisional Officer Krishnagiri - 635 001.
7.The Tahsildhar Krishnagiri - 635 001. WPoNo.o32547oofo2023 KRISHNANoRAMASAMY,oJ. VM WPoNo.o32547oofo2023 27-03-2026 Page5oofo5
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY P.Kalyanasundaram S/o.Ponnusamy,Marudhepalli Village, Krishnagiri Taluk And District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Chief Engineer Water Resource Department, Chennai Division, Chennai- 600 005. 2. The Superintendent Engineer Water Resource Department, Pennaiyaru Division, Thiruvannamalai- 606 603. 3. The Executive Engineer Public Works Department / Water Resource, Mel Pennaiyaru Water Division, Dharmapuri- 636 705. 4. The Assistant Engineer Water Resource Department, Pennaiyaru Division, Krishnagiri - 635 001. 5. The District Collector Krishnagiri - 635 115. 6. The Revenue Divisional Officer Krishnagiri - 635 001. 7. The Tahsildhar Krishnagiri - 635 001. 8. P.Arivazhagan ..Respondent(s) Page2 of 5 Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the concerned Respondents 1 to 7 to grant the compensation for the land acquired in the Survey Nos.169/ 5 and 170/3 of Orappam village, Bargur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. For Petitioner(s): Dr.G.Babu For Respondent(s): Mr. C.Gowthamaraj, GA for R1 to 7 No appearance for R8
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.