S.L.Darani v. R.Sanjaykumar

ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner (wife) and the learned counsel for the respondent (husband).

¶2The respondent in H.M.O.P.No.36 of 2025 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Hosur, is the petitioner herein. The said H.M.O.P. has been filed for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

¶3The petitioner would aver that she has been residing at Coimbatore along with her parents and she finds it difficult to travel to Hosur from Coimbatore for all the Court hearings, as she has to travel a distance of approximately 305 kms one way.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner would reiterate the grounds set out in the petition and seeks transfer of the aforesaid O.P. to the Family Court at Coimbatore.

¶5The learned counsel for the respondent would strenuously argue that before the Sub Court, she can even represent her case through counsel and seeks dismissal of the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition. Page3 of 5

¶6The principles regarding transfer petitions, more specifically in the matters of matrimonial cases are well settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the following cases:- "i. In AIR 2000 SC 3512 (1) (Mona Aresh Goel vs. Aresh Satya Goel), when the wife pleaded that she was unable to bear the traveling expenses and even to travel alone and stay at Bombay, the Supreme Court ordered transfer of proceedings. ii. In 2000 (10) SCC 304 (Geeta Heera Vs. Harish Chander Heera), the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that where the petitioner's wife has pleaded lack of money, the same has to be considered. Iii. In Lalita A. Ranga Vs. Ajay Champalal Ranja reported in (2009) 9 SCC 355, wherein the wife, who was having small child and she was finding it difficult to travel from Jaipur to Bombay, and the Hon'ble Apex Court accepting her request ordered the transfer petition in favour of the wife transferring the transfer petition from Family Court at Bandra in Mumbai to the Family Court at Jaipur."

¶7In consideration of the above said details, the request of the petitioner herein / wife appears to be based on justifiable cause and accordingly, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. Sequel to Page4 of 5 this, H.MO.P.No.36 of 2025 pending on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Hosur, is withdrawn and transferred to the file of the Family Court, Coimbatore. The learned Judge, Family Court, Coimbatore, on receipt of the records shall take all effective steps to try and dispose of the matter in accordance with law at the earliest. No Costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 09-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order MAC To

¶1The Additional Sub Court, Hosur

¶2The Family Court, Coimbatore TRoCMPoNo.o1086oofo2025 R.KALAIMATHI,eJ. MAC TReCMPeNo.e1086eofe2025 and CMPeNo.24454eofe2025 09-04-2026 Page5oofo5

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI and CMP No.24454 of 2025 S.L.Darani D/o. Loganathan, No.36/11D, Bhuvaneswari Nagar, Thekkupalayam Post, Periyanaikkenpalayam, Coimbatore - 641020. ..Petitioner(s) Vs. R.Sanjaykumar S/o. Rajendran, Residing at 29/65, 21 Cross, iBharathidasan Street, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. Currenlty residing at No.35, Agasthiya Avenue, Nathan Nagar Extension, Kothur Road, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, to withdraw and transfer in HMOP No.36 of 2025 which is pending on the file of the Additional Sub Court, at Hosur to be tried before the Family Court at Coimbatore District. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.M.Dinesh Sharma For Respondent(s): Mr.G.Ashok kumar Page2 of 5