VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Alagu Manjula v. P. Kartheeswaran

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 February 2026
Bench
A.D.Maria Cleteauthor
Case no.
TR CMP 1167/2024

Judgment

ORDER Heard.

¶2The present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner/wife seeking transfer of HMOP.No.176 of 2024, pending on the file of the Subordinate Court, Sivakasi and transfer the same to Subordinate Court, Pollachi.

¶3The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 06.11.2016 as per Hindu rites and customs and out the wedlock they are Page2 of 6 blessed with two children. The respondent/husband has instituted the above HMOP.No.176 of 2024 seeking divorce.

¶4The case of the petitioner is that after marriage, due to matrimonial discord, the petitioner was driven out the matrimonial home and she is residing along with her parent at Pollachi. It is further stated that she has to take care of her children and cannot undertake repeated travel with child.

¶5The petitioner has specifically pleaded that she has to travel about 250 kilometres from Pollachi to Sivakasi to attend the Court proceedings, which is causing undue hardship. It is further stated that she has no independent source of income and cannot afford the recurring travel and incidental expenses.

¶6There is no representation on behalf of the respondent.

¶7It is a well-settled proposition of law that in matrimonial proceedings, convenience of the wife deserves paramount consideration, particularly when she is residing at a different place and cannot undertake repeated travel with children. The Hon'ble Supreme Court and this Court have consistently held that such transfers are warranted to ensure effective access to justice and to avoid undue hardship to the wife. Page3 of 6

¶8In the present case, considering the residence of the petitioner at Pollachi, and the fact that the proceedings are in the initial stage, this Court is of the considered view that no serious prejudice would be caused to the respondent if the matter is transferred. On the other hand, refusal to transfer would result in grave hardship to the petitioner. Therefore, this Court finds sufficient cause to allow the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition.

¶9Accordingly, Tr.C.M.P. No.1167 of 2024 is allowed. HMOP.No.176 of 2024 on the file of the Subordinate C ourt, Sivakasi is withdrawn and transferred to the file of the Subordinate Court, Pollachi. The Subordinate court, Sivakasi, shall transmit the entire records to the Subordinate Court, Pollachi, within a period of three (3) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the Subordinate Court, Pollachi, shall dispose of the matter in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, uninfluenced by any observations made in this order. The interim stay granted by this court

14.11.2024 shall stand vacated. Consequently, C.M.P. No.25479 of 2024 is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 26-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order DPQ Page4 of 6 To

¶1The Suboridnate Court, Sivakasi.

¶2The Subordinate Court, Pollachi. TRoCMPoNo.o1167oofo2024 DR.A.D.MARIAoCLETE,oJ. DPQ TRoCMPoNo.o1167oofo2024 26-02-2026 Page5oofo6 Page6 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE and CMP.No.25479 of 2024 Alagu Manjula ..Petitioner(s) Vs P. Kartheeswaran ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed seeking to direct withdrawal of HMOP No.176 of 2024 on the file of Subordinate Court, Sivakasi and transfer the same to Subordinate Court Pollachi. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Venkateswaran For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Katheeswaran- NA

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.